The Dog That Didn’t Bark: The Donald Young Lie
The fictional Sherlock Holmes solved the crime in “Silver Blaze” by deducing it was the owner of the house who was the criminal. How did he know? Because the dog did not bark. The only person who could have committed the crime without arousing the dog was someone the dog knew as a friend, the dog’s owner.
Now, one might ask, how does this Sherlockian logic apply to Larry Sinclair and his Donald Young invective?
THE BEGINNING:
Larry made a video that he uploaded to You Tube on January 8, 2008. In that video he claimed to have had a sexual and drug encounter with then State Senator Barack Obama in November 1999.
Larry has since removed the video, but You Tube, as we all know is a venue where a video that allegedly had over a million hits becomes viral. Videos are copied so that although the original might have been deleted by the author, many copies remain. This is one such copy which is NOT doctored or altered in any way.
The video claimed that the events took place between November 3rd and November 8th 1999. Keep in mind that then State Senator Obama was engaged in a very high profile and heated race with Bobby Rush to win the Democratic Congressional Primary. To the reasonable mind, one could say that it would have been political suicide for a politician to openly engage in the activities that Larry claims Obama engaged in.
The most outstanding thing about Larry’s initial You Tube video has turned out to be OUR version of “The Dog That Didn’t Bark”. There was no mention of the murdered Trinity United Church of Christ choir director, Donald Young.
In fact Donald Young did not come up in any of Larry’s initial radio appearances either. Keep in mind that Larry’s video appeared on the internet on January 8th, 2008. The very first mention of Donald Young came on a Jeff Rense show on March 10th, 2008 in which Larry announced a “bombshell” on the air. That’s an entire two months from the time the You Tube video appeared. That metaphorical dog was awfully quite for two months regarding Donald Young.
One might ask, ‘when DID Larry start talking about the Donald Young story?’ Some feel that the first mention of Donald Young was mentioned 2/17/2008 on the Cao Show. It was there that Larry said:
“They’ve even posted something on the web to where it comes, if you Google my name, stating hey, you know Sinclair is going to be founded murdered and then they’re going to try and blame that on Obama too.”
Cao, the host of the radio show told Larry that murder was not being a stretch of the imagination there is the story of the murdered gay choir director at Obama’s church.
About a month after the Cao interview, Larry started throwing weather balloons to his supporters about Donald Young’s murder. Rather than make definitive statements about Donald Young, his blog posts were headed by questions. Its almost as if he was looking for some help from his supporters to put the Donald Young story together. He even solicited his supporters to go out and find other men in which Obama may have had similar experiences. They were not successful.
LARRY LOSES A STAUNCH SUPPORTER:
In March, 2008, Larry’s close confident and staunch supporter, “Victor” began to question Larry about this new “injection” into his meme about his encounters with Obama. Eventually, there was a fallout between Victor and Larry, because according to letters from Victor, that were published on Big Head DC by Larry, Victor felt there were many discrepancies in Larry’s story and that the Donald Young story was not only unexpected (two months after broadcasting the video on You Tube), but also inconsistent with what Larry had said in the past.
MY INTERVIEWS WITH TWO CHICAGOANS:
I had the opportunity to interview two people about the Donald Young murder. Both live in Chicago. One is a journalist, the other is the head of a Gay Men Coalition.
The Journalist was interviewed a few weeks ago. One of the questions I asked him was how well did he know Donald Young. The journalist, who asked to remain anonymous for the time being told me he did not know Mr. Young personally, but he knew of Mr. Young, prior to his death. He said he knew of Mr. Young’s accomplishments as well as attended the Donald Young funeral at TUCC.
I asked him could Donald Young have been attached to the Obama campaign back in 2007? He said that was highly unlikely since Donald Young had just achieved his second Masters degree and was also heavily involved with TUCC’s choir as well as conducting other choirs at public events. The Journalist said his plate was full and in his opinion could not have found time for anything else, like campaigning. It was PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE that Donald Young was active in his music as well as his teaching.
Last week I also interviewed a leader of a Gay Coalition movement in Chicago. I will not reveal his name because it is my experience that those opposed to having the TRUTH told about Larry Sinclair and his tale about Obama, Sex, Drugs and Murder would probably try and harass this man.
For the purposes of this article, I will refer to him as Mr. Gilletto. Mr. Gilletto told me that his organization had been in constant touch with the CPD since the murders of both Larry Bland and Donald Young. According to Mr. Gilletto, the purpose of staying in touch with the CPD was to determine if gay men were under attack by a serial killer. He explained that both lived in close proximity to each other. He also explained that his contact with CPD was to see if there was any connection to the murders in terms of forensics. The CPD and Mr. Gilletto are still in contact, and as of this writing, Mr. Gilletto was not at liberty to tell me the findings of the forensics.
However, Mr. Gilletto said that there were indeed similarities in the two murders. The obvious of courser was that they were gay and African American men. Secondly, as I previously mentioned they lived in the same neighborhood. The last similarity is something that I consider and exclusive and had never heard before. BOTH MEN WERE MEMBERS OF A SOCIAL NETWORK CALLED Adam 4 Adam. Adam 4 Adam, as described in Wikipedia has had its share of problems with more than a few of their members dying under unusual circumstances after meeting with someone from that network.
It’s very interesting that in my research, I found the internet SATURATED with the Donald Young/Larry Sinclair/Barack Obama invective, yet no where did I find a reference to Young or Bland having been members of a social network with a dubious history.
LARRY’S AFFIDAVIT TO THE CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT:
The real challenge came in April, 2008. After much pressure from his supporters, Larry contacted the Chicago Police Department and sent them an affidavit of what he knew about Donald Young. In doing this, he offered to submit telephone numbers as well. As M&N pointed out in a post dated around the same time, Larry’s minions assumed the numbers he was sending to the CPD were the numbers that Donald Young called from. By the way, obtaining those numbers are very easy. They normally come in your monthly statements, or you can obtain them online.
Sinclair allegedly led his supporters to believe he was submitting Donald Young’s numbers from Young’s alleged contact with Sinclair. However, all he submitted to the CPD were the FOUR phone numbers he claimed that he had while moving from one place to another.
But wait! That’s not the most telling and damning thing about the Donald Young saga and Larry Sinclair.
The affidavit is lacking a lot of the bluster and hoopla that Larry was so famous for on his blog.
No where in that affidavit does Larry mention his often sensational claims that Obama and Reverend Wright had something to do with the Donald Young’s murder. This is quite a contrast to what appeared on his blog about Donald Young and the Obama-Wright connection.
(That darn dog just refuses to bark!)
I found it odd that for weeks, Larry’s blog was filled with speculation and accusations about Obama and his connection to the Donald Young and Larry Bland murders. In fact, Larry Bland was never mentioned in the affidavit nor was any hint that Larry felt there was a connection between Obama and the two murders.
(Damn that non-barking dog!)
THE NATIONAL PRESS CONFERENCE:
In another case of “The Dog That Didn’t Bark”, after thoroughly reviewing the June 18, 2008 NPC transcript of Larry’s statement at his infamous press conference, again, like the affidavit to the CPD, no where in his statement did he mention any connection to the Obama or Wright and the Donald Young murder.
Conclusion: Curious incidents…
I find it curious that Larry Sinclair never mentioned Donald Young in his initial video.
I find it curious that Larry Sinclair never mentioned Donald Young in any of his radio interviews until two months after his initial video.
I find it curious that given all the sensationalism and garish headlines on his blogs about the Obama/Wright murder conspiracy, not once was his declarative statements about Barack Obama’s culpability in the Donald Young murder mentioned in his affidavit to the CPD nor his written statement at the National press Club.
The Dog That Didn’t Bark, is the metaphorical way of saying Larry Sinclair’s story about Donald Young contacting him as well as implicating Barack Obama in the murder of Donald Young is missing some key elements. Those missing elements are essentially the “non-barking dog”.
Additional Reading Material
Blogs:
http://chgocutie.blogspot.com/2008/05/nate-spencer-donald-young-barack-obama.html
http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/where-is-la-ryes-proof/
http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/larry-lies-about-tying-obama-to-murders/
Larry’s public documents:
http://larrysinclair.org/download/Statement.pdf
http://larrysinclair.org/download/affidavit.pdf
Last but not least, I would like to credit someone that worked extremely hard to get the word out about Sinclair’s discrepancies, and that’s Jayautwitch.
I got a lot of my material from her extensive look at the ENTIRE SINCLAIR fiasco.
http://jayautwitch.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/donald-young-part-1-ring-ring/
and
http://jayautwitch.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/donald-young-part-2-the-gay-angle/
UPDATE:
We will be comparing the affidavit at the following link with the originally linked version. Please feel free to discuss in the meantime.
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/larry-sinclair-affidavit.pdf
An excellent recap, BB; thanks for all the hard work in compiling and organizing the facts. I believe that Sinclair was recruited to make the initial allegations against then Senator Obama after the Iowa primary. However, I believe, that when he threw in the Donald Young lie, he “went off the reservation” and engaged in a rogue action. Instead of being merely unbelievable, he became outrageously unbelievable, in no small part due to the additional holes in his story.
Very well done. Some comment, if I may.
1. You say: “However, it turned out that the numbers Larry submitted to the CPD were the four numbers Sinclair used during his brief telephone interlude with Donald Young.”
He never had any contact with Donald Young brief or otherwise.
Do you mean he provided his own numbers to the police and falsely declared that he had called Donald Young from those numbers without any proof that he made such calls?
2. Sinclair’s major mistake that proves that all his claims are lies is that he said he had never received a response to his various calls and letters and challenges to Obama and his campaign.
He said this throughout the second half of 2007 and up until March 2008. He said it to the newspapers he began calling in December 2007 and January, 2008 - one of whom sent a senior Pulitzer Prize winning journalist to his home in Duluth for a couple of days. He said it in his January 2008 You Tube video, he said it to the people who organised his lie-detector test, he said it in numerous radio interviews, he said it repeatedly in his various blogs and websites, he said it in emails and in telephone conversations with numerous individuals.
In fact he offered it as the main, central justification of his public campaign.
He said he only went public because he got no reply to his calls to Obama and his campaign about Obama’s alleged drug-taking.
As you correctly state he suddenly changed his story in March 2008. Then he said that actually he had received not one but a whole series of response to his calls and letters to the Obama campaign throughout the latter half of 2007. He said Donald Young explained he was responding to Sinclair’s messages to the Obama campaign. He said that Donald Young knew about the alleged gay sex - even though Sinclair had never mentioned it - because Obama told him. He said that Donald Young was acting for both Obama and the Reverend Wright to organise a public statement that Obama had agreed to make to appease Sinclair. As Sinclair got caught up in his ridiculous lie he added for good measure that Donald Young confided in him that he, too, had had gay sex with Obama.
I say ridiculous lie. But its more than that. It was a cynical, self-serving lie that used the life and reputation of Donald Young for Sinclair’s criminal objectives and trampled over the feelings of Donald Young’s grieving family.
It was also a lie that insulted the intelligence and common-sense of those who had been open-minded about Sinclair’s claims.
Sinclair’s claims about Obama were proven to be lies by an independent lie-detector test in February 2008. It was only after he saw his scam falling apart that he went for one more Big Lie about Donald Young. After all, he was dead and could not defend himself.
The irony is that Sinclair began with the truth. It was true that nobody from the Obama campaign had responded to him. It’s still true.
Awesome Article!
Off to bed. (I do believe I am TIRD)
GoodNight M.i!
Scaramouche, that should have been “…the numbers Sinclair ALLEGEDLY used…”
*edited thanks*
No, and I apologize for the misunderstanding. Sinclair allegedly led his supporters to believe he was submitting Donald Young’s numbers from Young’s alleged contact with Sinclair. However, all he submitted to the CPD were the FOUR phone numbers he claimed that he had while moving from one place to another.
(edited)
Scaramouche you are absolutely correct and my ommission of that fact was inadvertant. I do apologize for leaving out such an integral part of this “Great Lie”.
Thank you for bringing it to the forefront.
Fabulous post, Bitches Brew!!!
Bill Maher is on fire!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFM_R7pnmpw
Bitches Brew,
Very well done! MAGNIFIQUE!!!
I made my appearance at his blog when he first started his crazy tales about Donald Young.
I remember critically reading the affidavit he filed to the CPD.
Remember, since he knew he was unlawfully interfering with a homicide investigation, he took steps to ensure that if they did find the real murderer of Young, he wouldn’t be found guilty of lying and obstructing justice.
How did he do this?
Repeatedly saying mentioning a “Mr. Young” from the Obama campaign–not mentioning that he BELIEVED (Keep this in mind–clever language) that this Mr. Young was Donald Young.
On his blog, on the radio shows, and in his youtube videos, Sinclair made declaratory statements that it was, indeed, Donald Young of Trinity United Church of Christ that had contacted in the latter half of 2007; a fact which can be proven by not only the substance of his WordPress Blog entries, but their titles. Titles such as: “What Donald Had to Say”. These entries and statements, obviously, are stark contrasts to the language statements he made in the affidavit to the CPD.
Not only does the aforementioned difference in language call into question Sinclair’s credibility and honesty on this key issue, but it also shines a suspicious light on the validity of all of his claims. When such contradictory statements are made (i.e., that he didn’t get any response from the Obama campaign–and–that he did get an indirect response in the form of the murdered choir director Donald Young), you must exercise what most people call common-sense, and come to the conclusion that Sinclair is lying about at least one thing. Questions start to emerge: if he’s lying about one thing, what else may he be lying about? Can we use this as an example of contradictory statements and the careful use of language that may apply to other things he has said in the past about his accusations?
Yes, you can. In fact, Sinclair has changed his story multiple times, but he has done it subtly enough to catch people who lack the capacity for common sense to miss the changes (as well as fooling people who have enough hatred in their hearts to accept what he says without question, and susceptible people who came to know his accusations months after the biggest changes to his accusations).
For instance, the timeline. We know that, originally, Sinclair claimed the events happened somewhere between November 3rd and November 8th, 1999. Ignoring the fact that, later, when we got our hands on his criminal record we found he was on probation at the time–which fueled suspicion he was never in Chicago at that time because he can offer no evidence that he was actually there–he can only proved someone spent some money. I found it convenient that he couldn’t remember the exact dates, but he could remember such intricate details in the events of his accusations; events such as losing his hat on the freeway when he stuck his head out of the back of the limousine. Only later did he decide which were the right days–many weeks after his initial public appearance.
If you go back to the Donald Young claims, you can see that he took full advantage of the controversy started by Jeremiah Wright. According to my memory, when he was first testing the waters with the Donald Young story, he made nary a peep about Jeremiah Wright or any other member of Trinity United Church of Christ being involved with Obama, or the murder of Donald Young. However, when the tapes of Jeremiah Wright came into the mainstream, Sinclair leaped onto this opportunity by trying to form a connection between Obama, Young, and Wright–a connection that was dubious even in his twisted tale of lies. Once again, he offered no evidence and only vague accusations.
I believe he even tried to claim that Wright was involved with Obama or Young on a sexual level.
Now, keeping in mind the fact that I never trusted anything Sinclair said for many reasons, the Young accusations were enough for me to decide that he was lying about the entire affair.
Since then, I have marveled at how a random cobbling-together of living cells that tries to pass itself off as human has been able to abuse the legacy of a dead man for his own gain.
It has been disgusting.
Ha!hahahahahaha! Karl Rove!
Thanks everyone for the insightful posts and for the accolades.
I’m not done yet.
There is something I need to explore to the fullest extent. Frau Doctor Death…er I mean Petersen’s collusion in all of this. Hopefully I can get some help or either volunteer MY services if someone wants to do an indepth look at Dr. petersen’s role in obtaining the death certificates of Donald Young and Larry bland ILLEGALLY!
We need to revisit our previous posts on her and do some more investigation into her current status and whether or not she has even been sanctioned for the crime she committed.
John, your mind is so sharp and clear. Thank you for YOUR insight into the Donald Young saga according to The Liar Sinclair.
Great synopsis of Larry’s Donald Young lies, BB.
JF — It’s interesting that what Larry told the CPD and what he was telling his audience were two different things with regard to Young. To the CPD, he only knew him as Mr. Young but to his audience, he knew him as Donald Young or just Donald. He covered his ass to some extent with the CPD by not claiming any knowledge of who he talked to.
I’m pretty sure the story evolved from a Mr. Young calling him to Donald Young saying he had an affair with Obama to finally, if I recall correctly, Donald confiding intimate details of sex acts performed between him and Obama. Larry “grew” the story to make it more sexually titillating to his audience.
Nice work!
In addition to all the other inconsistencies, he was inconsistent about Obama and Young’s involvement. First he said Young was connected to Obama’s campaign. No assertion of an affair.
Then he said that a sexual relationship between Obama and Young was ‘implied’ by Young in these alleged repeated phone calls. In a radio interview (Dense I think) he said that it was never stated explicitly, but that Larry, as a gay man, understood the meaning of Young’s statements.
Eventually he said in subsequent radio interviews that Young explicitly informed him that he and Obama had a sexual relationship. He started offering quotes from Young stating that he and Obama were sexually involved.
It’s like any fish story–the details change with every retelling.
Good work BB~~
Bitches Brew,
It’s true Larry lost Victor over this lie, but we cannot forget about some of his other *once* strong supporters,
Lynne DeBoth as well as Spencer McDonald, I have selected these two posts from M&N as depicted in here, the first M&N post “Inside Tardville”, take the time to read this, it is truly worth it and also this post at M&N properly entitled “The Sickening Lie About Donald Young” , here we can see what *actually* occurred at the time, by reading the emails displayed, they do reveal much.
A special hat tip to Lynne DeBoth for sharing these emails with us at the M&N Show!
Lynne, you have endured much pain from this Monstrous Sick-liar as the result of offering us insight on what actually occurred behind the scenes, Lynne, I commend you!
To this day, many of his supporters do not fully understand what *ACTUALLY* happened when these once upon a time, true supporters left…. briefly they all shared one thing in common, they dared to question FatBoy.
Whatever happened to thedon6565?
He also was reported to have moved on as well, and also many many more….
I doubt very much these emails, or the *true* story about these people will be included in his *Book of LIES!*
Did larry get blown away???
News about the Tornado in Port Orange, Fl.
Posted July 25, 2009
Pictures: Possible tornado touches down in Port Orange
http://www.orlandosentinel.com:80/news/local/breakingnews/orl-tornado-port-orange-pictures-072409,0,7703469.photogallery
How far is BlueSky Drive from Larry’s tin house?
Look at timestamp 1:45 is that larry waddling down the sidewalk?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHGXwSOPDQU
Meesh — Thanks for the links. Was fun to read the old M&N posts and see the genesis of Larry’s attacks on Lynn. She and his other staunch supporters saw the problem with Larry’s Donald Young claims and tried to warn him but instead he turned on Lynn. Also his mother (or he was impersonating her) attacked Lynn like a rabid dog. Such language!
Great work, BB! Thanks so much for all your efforts!
Some time back,one of the regulars here spoke with a Chicago police official and was told; “Larry Sinclair is crazy.” Unfortunately, this investigator could not say more about the investigation. Too bad, too. If the investigator(s) could publicly state where the investigation stands, Lardy’s book would go straight to the bottom of any and all book sale lists. Oh, wait; it’s all ready there. Well, maybe the book would become lower then whale crap.
Glix
Are you referring to this comment at BHDC? I have saved that, now if that wasn’t Sick-Liar or what??
Check out the spelling errors, he talks about “my attorney”
and the dead give-away “you have a great day” what an *idiot*
For some reason, I keep thinking of Norman Bates from PSYCHO, every time I read that poorly written comment at BHDC!
I bet Larry is not at home or he would have been crying on twitter, just like the last time they had a storm!
Power was out in his neighborhood.. So how could he be tweeting and posting peoples posts on his blawg all night?
he’s at Moma’s ,I bet!
YC~~ the CPD.. thinks Larry is a nut! And dangerous! lol
They don’t believe his fairytale either!
Norman Bates! It was the music…eee!eee!eee!eee!
Scares me just thinking about it. A girlfriend and I watched it on TV when we were young teens. We were in her basement with the lights out and had a blanket we pulled over our heads when we got too scared.
It was really close to Larry’s trailer.
Look at the map:
http://i30.tinypic.com/244objr.jpg
There are pictures of the damage at the link, and yet Larry is oblivious to the tornado. He’d have his camera and video cam out shooting everything in sight and uploading the pictures, sending them to TV stations and area newspapers with his name in CAPITAL LETTERS and racing to TV camera to get on the air, first telling his life story of giving obama a bj first and would demand he’d be described as “author Larry Sinclair.” But if he didn’t do that–and he had power and internet access after the storm passed–he’s not there. I wonder where he is?
http://www.wftv.com/countybycounty/20172381/detail.html
Bandita,
The CPD is correct, he is dangerous…and they probably know more about Larry then we do…and we know a lot!
OH OH!!
Larry will say that the tornado got his stash of books!! Damaged!
Tax write off!!
How far is BlueSky Drive from Larry’s tin house?
Holy moses. Right next door. just click the minus 5 times.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Post+Orange+&state=FL&address=Blue+Sky+Drive
And he is not being the drama queen about it!
He’s not home!
Meesh and BB,
Great post and thanks Meesh for putting back up that chain of events that happened with Sinclair.
I wondered if BB had all of that stuff that I had sent Mitch and I actually did mean to resend it. I found a few more too but I think you guys have covered it pretty well. Once I realized he was really crazy as you see from the email I exited the scene. It was good for me to revisit those email, I had forgotten some of that.
Yes Sinclair has tried to make me miserable but he who laughs last, laughs last.
We had to order the book, uggg, we paid $26.00 to B & N and I finally got confirmation that it is shipped via UPS and we should have it on Monday. I will share if anyone wants it.
neonzx says:
July 25, 2009 at 11:05 am
It was really close to Larry’s trailer.
“Close” only counts in horse shoes, Neon!
But, damn! That WAS close! I think Bandita’s correct, old Thunder Thighs must be staying elsewhere.
Toots! he lies
tootin:: More lies and garbage from trailer park clown :::::TOOTS!
Lynne says:
July 25, 2009 at 11:10 am
We had to order the book, uggg, we paid $26.00 to B & N and I finally got confirmation that it is shipped via UPS and we should have it on Monday. I will share if anyone wants it.
Line the bottom of the bird cage with it, girlfriend! One benefit of ordering from B&N instead of directly from Fats is the fact you won’t have to worry about it arriving with dog hairs, the smell of Lardy’s cigarettes (and Larry himself) on every page.
YC~~ and his spit!
He’s lying!
He’s not there. Where is Larry?
Fuck you Larry. Get outside and shoot some video and PROVE you are at Lighthouse Pointe!
You’re on vacation again, aren’t you?
Meesh, I forgot to say, you know when Moma was referring to me as
Hypocrisy Buster. That was Spencer McDonald and not me. I did post some on Big head but not a lot. I think I posted under my own name too, hard to remember all that mess.
moma thought she had it figured out but she didn’t. Such idiots, lardass and moma. Also what was she faxing posts to Joe Biden for?
Crazy crap.
The truth about the chat room too was Dan, the guy from NC set it up and I posted very little in there. Best I recall,moma posted the most there along with Spencer, Dan, Robin and a few others but there was not much to it. A lot of crazy mess happened that I wish I had never been involved in but we live and learn and move on.
I was just trying to help my friend Hillary and got involved with a crazy, insane man doing it.
Larry says:
I truly feel blessed.”
By Satan, undoubtedly
There would have been fire trucks, sirens etc.. in his neighborhood and the fucking pig didn’t hear a thing?
He wasn’t home!
Lynne-
If there is nothing worthwhile (from a legal stance) in the book, you can RETURN the book to B&N for a full refund! Larry will get charged-back.
Neonzx,
Well as I said I “had” to order it for legal reasons so I probably will have to hang on to it, but if anyone wants any part of it let me know and I will let you read my copy, I know no one wants it but if anyone needs to see any part of it for any reason just let me know. But right if there is nothing that is in it worthwhile legally we will return it. Good point.
Lynne
When you refer to Dan, this is the staunch supporter at the very beginning, thedon6565, correct?
Also that was not Moma at BHDC, I swear it was FatBoy playing Norman Bates again… what a Psycho *idiot*
I find it hard to believe Fats maintained a cell phone connection in the midst of a tornado. He’s allegedly on the phone a lot with this, that or another organization in Chicago, from anonymous bookstores to anonymous lawyers. He probably was on one of those 900 numbers; “Dial a BJ” or, “Pork a Hungry Bottom”
Meesh,
Yeah that is correct. I wish I could remember or find his last name. I do know that after I gave all of that stuff to Mitch he sent me an email, I think I still have that email but he wanted to ask me to not reveal his identity to Mitch the Bitch, Isn’t that funny???
He was a law student at that time and a Republican as were
Spencer and Robin.
BB,
Excellent post!! Knocked my socks off.
wow…Kristin is a hottie!
http://cdn.fastclick.net/fastclick.net/cid184449/media348036.jpg
Lynne
Thanks, but there’s no need to recall what Dan’s true name is, it is not necessary, I am happy he moved on and away from that liar!
He did strike me as quite an intellectual , he was only disillusioned as many were in the beginning.
In January of 2008 during the YouTube days, thedon6565 was very supportive and defended Sickliar, because at the beginning he truly wanted to believe him, but at the end he could not… Another loss for FatBOY!
No doubt, Sickliar did not mention how loyal thedon6565 was towards him and how he helped to raise the much needed cash to get him to LA for the polygraph test, so FatBoy could collect more money, in *THE BOOK*, thedon6565 only decided to walk away.
Once again I want to commend Bitches Brew for the great post and yes Lardass is lying about Donald Young and big time.
Once I get the book on Monday and read parts of it should I write my review at B & N and Amazon? Tee Hee. I will wear surgical gloves when I handle it and a mask over my nose and mouth even though it comes from a warehouse, it says coming out of NJ on the shipping info, but I still will smell the stench just from the thought process of Lardass and his rotten mind. I will take it on to my attorney but recommend that he disinfects it too.
I ought to be qualified though wouldn’t you think to write a review on that pamplet.
Yeah I agree with Democratista, Lardass is such a waste of time that not sure I will take the time to do that but I just might.
trumpet:::: : ::: :::
Hey Neon,
Lard’s post is directed at your comment:
“If there is nothing worthwhile (from a legal stance) in the book, you can RETURN the book to B&N for a full refund! Larry will get charged-back.”
He even uses the same words “charged back”. One more example of how Lard lies directly to his supporters. So Lard, you never read comments over here? You lie like a rug.
ZeN! and Bitches Brew
Thanks person!
Hahahahahaha! “Oh My” I second that when you said,
“So Lard, you never read comments over here? You lie like a rug.”
He reads our posts and corrects them too, what a guy, I tell ya!
Did you enjoy the post???…. the date is wrong, you say?
We’ll get on it, right away and amend Bitches Brew’s fabulous post….. NOT!
Have a nice day!
(I thought I smelled Tuna breath, in here!)
January 17, 2008, 2007, 2009; what’s the difference? You’re still a wacked out sociopathic liar
Hey, Douche, get a freaking job and stop sponging off working people. Are you making good use of the illegal SS & medicaid benefits?
Oprah is going to highlight your lazy thieving ass. Ha ha.
hey SLOB ..from B& N you fat fuck …your pamphlet isnt shipped shrink wrapped you retard.
It’s easy to return an item if you’re not satisfied.
We will issue a refund to your original form of payment for items returned within 14 days.
Items must be returned in their original condition; shrink-wrapped products must be unopened.
Most people have read it in a few hours so the 14 day refund is really Nice!!
Does she know what she’s letting herself in for? She is utterly clueless.
GO TO WORK, PUTZ AND SUPPORT YOURSELF. STOP SPONGING.
Borat,
I paid through Pay Pal too and they always guarantee total satisfaction. Believe me I would never spend a dime on that piece of crap except that we need that book for a good reason.
If we are around when the book comes, we will video the book arriving, the unwrapping and the book itself and if it is not shrink wrapped then we could return it unless it is somehow beneficial to us.
joeymac — Taitz on Colbert? That I’ve got to see. Once she gets wound up, nobody else gets a word in edgewise.
joeymac-
Where are you seeing this Taitz on Colbert announcement? Please provide links to bombshells like this.
Dear God,
You missed.
k-thnx-bye.
TJ
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ Neon….. here is the site where Oily tells about the comedy channel….also Oily doesn`t want Steve Pidgeon`s stinking help!
See, I firmly believe the Donald Young claims should have pushed this over the edge from “Highly Suspect Unproven Allegations” to “Complete Fabrication and Scam”.
The fact that they really didn’t only serves to underscore the perverse nature of the internet and the media.
What really tips the scale to make this entire affair and “Outright lie” is the way Sinclair has handled the situation. I believe his insistence that he has constantly been hampered by “Obama Surrogates” and “Obots” and other such nonsense has actually done more damage to him than anything else.
I say this with the knowledge that the previous statement seems to contradict what experience may tell us about the nature of such allegations; but in making Obama a bogeyman and an enemy to be destroyed, Sinclair demolished his credibility.
Though I cannot speak for other people, or Sinclair himself, I would postulate that this loss of credibility because of his antagonization of Obama and his supporters stems from a perceived slant to racism on not only Sinclair’s part, but that of his followers. Keep in mind that I am not accusing Sinclair of being a racist, I am merely postulating on perceptions that he may have created by stoking the fires on his alleged Young/Wright/Obama connection.
From the beginning I often stated that this whole mess was a game of perception; and it was a game Sinclair lost because of his own actions. His contradictory statements, his shady past and his current suspect dealings, and his proclivity to attack people who dared to question or challenge him all lead to his complete dismissal by the mainstream media.
I keep suggesting that we take it back to the beginning and really look at the Lie Detector Test because I feel that we have missed a vital part of that chapter of the story, but I cannot put my finger on what. To me, something feels incomplete or missing from what we know of the story. I suspect it mostly has to do over the nature of the test, and the events leading up to Sinclair’s claim that Parisi was paid off by Axelrod to fix the test.
Though that is only one claim among many that Sinclair has never proven with so much as even circumstantial evidence, it represents something important to me: he often claims that he is not motivated by money, and that he is doing this out of some twisted view of the common good. Note that whenever someone opposes him, he links their opposition not with moral or factual objection, but with money. Take note of some of Sinclair’s favorite bogeymen: PAID Obama Bloggers; PAID Obama Lawyers; in fact, he tries to claim that those that try to undermine his endeavors are in some way being compensated with monetary reward.
This is an important aspect of how he tries to frame the debate against those that oppose him. The bloggers are “idiots,” and the journalists are “in Obama’s pocket” (another link to money). What he’s attempting to do is shift the perceptions of greed and immorality onto his opposition by trying to link their actions with the pursuit of money.
Therefore, it is made to look like those who oppose him oppose him not for moral, factual, or judicial reasons, but for profit. It’s sort of a clever trick.
So, in essence, what I’m trying to say is that he has failed everything he has tried to do because of his own ineptness.
And, because of his problematic history of causing his own failure, I suspect this whole book project will end up blowing up in his face.
I believe, based on my experience, that he’ll try to paint it as a success, and he’ll use much of the same language that he has in the past for other failures of his. Expect to see “PAID this-or-that” and “idiots” and other such things thrown around as he vainly tries to salvage a debacle he caused.
I also think that he’ll try to spin failures of his to become successes as he constantly lowers the bar on what his supporters and others should expect from his book project, media exposure, and his shell corporation.
But that’s just an educated guess based on my experience with his other failed endeavors.
I’m watching a National Geographic special on the Unabomber right now, and I can’t get over how much he looks like Larry.
Today is a day I’ve designated to “take it easy” for several reasons. But I am compelled to shed some light on John Freeman’s premise regarding the lie detector test.
John keep in mind that the article I wrote was soley focused on the Donald Young injection of Larry’s story. However, you and Scaramouche bring up some really great points as a result of and prior to the Donald Young saga, which Larry improvised into his meme.
John Freeman says:
John, Jayautwitch agrees with your premise and wrote extensively about the Polygraph/Results/Axlerod-Parisi sagas.
I will quote some here but link to her entire dossier for further research on the issue:
What happened before the polygraph?
Larry wrote to Parisi and told him he could save him some money if he he went along with his proposal. Below are emails publicly displayed by Larry on his blog and other places on the internet:
Keep in mind that Parisi’s original offer was 10K for TAKING the test and 90K if/when he passed the test. Cunning Larry KNEW he would not pass that test and wanted to sweeten the “runner-up” package.
So bottom line was Larry walks away with 20K, and an additional 10K goes to the proposed charity.
http://jayautwitch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/larry-sinclair-dossier2.pdf
John, in an email from Jayautwich last year, she wrote this:
I admire and respect Jay to the fullest. Her work on Sinclair is immaculate and thorough. The above memo was in response to my wanting to expose Sinclair but not knowing how to go about it.
John, Jay said it all right there.
Post!
Ah, yes. Rereading the affidavit also reminded me about the big stink he made about the Notary signing the document and how that somehow made it legitimate.
Oh My!!! Lou Dobbs has some explaining to do.
http://open.salon.com/blog/mortimer_hayden_smyth/2009/07/22/shocking_report_lou_dobbs_birth_certificate_a_fake
BTW, those pictures on Lardass’ post regarding the tornado touchdown in his area are not HIS. He has given no credit at all to the Daytona News article posted here:
http://www.news-journalonline.com/special/storms/2009/julytornado/
C’mon Lardass, you are always balking about copywrites yet you constantly lift things and put them on your blog w/o any credit. Grow a set for once Larry and give credit where credit is due. Sheesh!
I personally feel Lardass was not even home, or he and Maxine we would be squealing loud enough to hear him where I am in CO.
Bitches Brew,
Excellent post! Good work!
JF — You touched on where I think Larry has done himself the most damage. When he put out the YouTube video and his interviews in the few months afterward, he implied he was a lifelong Democrat and would probably vote for Obama. He seemed to harbor no ill feelings, just wanted to get the “truth” out. That position helped him with his credibility.
He appeared (and still does) to be a drug user, perhaps a homeless guy, who didn’t think that doing drugs or having sex in a limo was enough to prevent Obama from getting elected because he could relate to it.
As time went on that facade dropped and Larry began to attack the Democrats, Liberals and all things Obama. He spouts rightwing talking points, quotes Fox News and posts articles attacking everything Obama does. As such, he’s just another wingnut trying to do political harm to a Democratic President and the Democrats in general.
He’s also lately regained his virginity, become an uber-Christian, touts the joys of gun ownership and claims he never had a drug problem.
Why should the rightwing embrace his particular brand of craziness when they have other better choices? Even if they pretended Larry’s story was true, it wouldn’t get Obama out of office or even impeached. So why bother to promote it?
The birthers however, have found a conspiracy that if it were true could force the President to step down (at least using the wingnut version of the Constitution it could). So that’s the one people like Lou Dobbs and Fox News are going with.
Dr. Oily is going to be on the Colbert Report? Really?
Do you think she realizes it’s a comedy show?
Has anybody else noticed that Larry is losing followers on twitter since his book came out?
RuhRoh-
Apparently they have Orly scheduled for an interview @2pm on Tuesday– not live in studio. Likely going to be in a “Better know a district” style… or rather, “Better know a crackpot”.
Orly’s supporters are trying to talk her out of doing the interview. Orly’s such an attention whore that I’m sure she’ll do it anyway.
ohh roh ……. his book is a typo/lie/improper composition- filled sack of toiletpaper that offers NO proof, its good for asswipe, the the paper is a grainy texture, ive used it it 5 times and consider it the best.
From B&N..
” Why haven’t the Chicago police acted on the affidavit?”
Why? Because they KNOW Larry Sinclair is mentally unstable. They didn’t believe his affidavit. They know things about the DY case that Larry doesn’t know. They do not believe anything the mental case has to say or write.
Cool beans.. this one already found Larry’s book on the internet..lmao
Glix
I don’t think Sinclair “converted” over time. Its just that he found there was more money in pandering to the right than to the left - and still does. He will do and say anything for money.
I also think he was helped by the lack of credibility of some of his early critics. I’m referring to those who started from a starry-eyed quasi-sexual attachment to Obama - much the same as Sinclair’s but with a different application.
There were some ridiculous statements on BHDC and M&N about Obama changing the world because he was the Mother Theresa of community development, the great intellect of the Harvard Law Review etc etc. Actually there was nothing to prove that he was not just another ambitious politician who had no great distinction or other achievements in his life who had come up through the old Chicago machine and had fallen in with or recruited some smart political operators and savvy internet operators, who played the race card very well and who rode his luck on the way to the Illinois Senate and Congress.
For those who did not know Obama in early 2008, it was reasonable and prudent to be open-minded about Sinclair’s allegations until they could be tested and then dismissed. Sinclair gained a sympathetic hearing from some partly because some of his critics were so abusive and emotive.
As it happens, it was when the open-minded critics advised and requested him to produce his evidence i.e. the driver, phone and hotel records, witnesses etc that he began to fall apart and lash out in all directions.
When it was demonstrable that he was lying then abuse and ridicule became appropriate irrespective of who was his target - Obama, Clinton or whoever.
He now stands exposed as a liar, a confidence trickster, a welfare cheat, a tax dodger, a slanderer of the dead, an interferer in the course of justice, and a potentially dangerous person with severe mental health issues.
Larry has “the tooth” and he’s not afraid to use it!
(PS. I’m sure you still look like a fat crackhead, Larry)
Scaramouche-
While I am in agreement that some people definitely over-romanticized Obama, you are making some very bold claims that are your opinions, not facts. As in “who had no great distinction or other achievements in his life who had come up through the old Chicago machine and had fallen in with or recruited some smart political operators and savvy internet operators, who played the race card very well and who rode his luck on the way to the Illinois Senate and Congress.”
If you didn’t vote for Obama, that’s fine. But it might be a good idea to avoid mudslinging here. Not really the focus of this site.
RuhRoh
I’m here for the Sinclair issue not “the focus of the site” - whatever that is.
The M&N site was focussed on Sinclair. I realise this is a different site.
I am not really interested in all the knee-jerk Palin-bashing, “birfers” discussion, the Ed Hale and other nutty minutiae. It doesn’t bother me and I can see everyone is having a nice time and I’m happy about that. I’m just not interested in it and I skim over it looking for Sinclair references.
I see you don’t agree with my comments about Obama - that doesn’t bother me either.
“I also think he was helped by the lack of credibility of some of his early critics. I’m referring to those who started from a starry-eyed quasi-sexual attachment to Obama - much the same as Sinclair’s but with a different application.”
O_o
Ha ha. You never change.
And that’s just the way I like it.
Anyway, I really don’t think it had anything to do with Sinclair’s critics that lent him credibility. I think, instead, it was a community of enablers and cognitively-challenged folk who spread unfounded rumors and accusations on the internet.
It’s like any conspiracy. It propagates on back-channel resources and gains traction and a following of hard-core supporters. It gains an almost cult status. After a while, it starts to feed on itself and reaches a point where the accusations or conspiracy must be true because, hey, nobody disproved it, or alternatively, it has been around a long time.
I think that Sinclair just had good timing–whether or not it was dumb luck or a type of conniving, I don’t really know. He took advantage of passions on all sides.
Whether it was the racist, the hard-right, the religious, the cognitively-challenged, the Obama supporters, independents, bored kids on the internet, or Scaramouche’s “starry-eyed” supporters of Obama with a “quasi-sexual attachment” (ha ha…this is hilarious to me!).
See, I went in with a mind-set of “it’s the internet–don’t trust and do verify.” Knowing the internet as I do and the way things can propagate I knew that the only rational way to look at Sinclair’s claims was with a skeptical eye that involved demanding evidence and, in some respects, laughing at him when he failed to help his cause.
I know people that are easily susceptible to falling for conspiracy theories–even if they are easily proven to be false. One or two of these people, as a result of Sinclair, started to get paranoid about Obama. I found it an interesting case study. As time wore on they forgot about Sinclair and the paranoia dissipated.
I don’t know. I guess what I’m trying to say is that it’s fine to be open-minded–but there’s a difference between being prudently open-minded and just downright naive and gullible.
This doesn’t even begin to touch upon his supporters that were certain that anyone who questioned Sinclair that were open-minded about the prospect of a President Obama must have been some sort of brain-washed, thought-lacking group of nitwits who was in love with Obama.
I’ve never seen such specious arguments.
My two cents…starry-eyed” supporters of Obama with a “quasi-sexual attachment
There probably were some Obama supporters back in January of 2008 that fit that description. I can’t imagine myself being one of them. It was not until Obama started proving that he was a viable candidate (for me that was around April 2008) by winning a few primaries, that I finally and wholeheartedly jumped on the “Hope” bandwagon.
“Starry-eyed”? Nah. “Quasi-sexual attachment”? Unlikely. For me it wasn’t about some passionate, blind loyalty to Obama that made me oppose Sinclair’s story, it was the obvious lies and everchanging twists to them. For me, Sinclair had zero credibility because he had zero proof.
In my opinion, the description Scaramouche gives, fit the Sinclair supporters to a tee. They never investigated his claim; their hatred or fear of Obama moving ahead in the primaries and the reality of Obama possibly becoming the POTUS instilled a fear and desperation that Sinclair took full advantage of. He knew his supporters would not demand proof. To them, because Sinclair said it happened, then it must have happened. The remainder of his supporters still feel that way now.
I am reminded of Victor, who supported Sinclair unconditionally. He harrangued those who spoke out against Sinclair’s claims. He gave those eloquent “tongue-lashings” to anyone who dared to cross the proverbial rubicon. Some, like myself couldn’t understand what it was about Sinclair’s story that made Victor so passionate about protecting Sinclair’s image and virtual environment? My only conclusion was that he was as passionate about his opposition to the idea of an Obama presidency as he was passionate about Sinclair’s story. Victor was Sinclair’s Goebbels. His spinmeister, as it were…in MY opinion.
One last thing of note. While typing this I noticed that those in the “anti-Sinclair camp” are varied in terms of their politics and “passions” regarding Obama. Some feel just like the Sinclair supporters about Obama. However, the difference is that they know that Sinclair is lying by virtue of having NO PROOF to support his story. Some people here are on the fence about Obama or are very pro-Obama. There is an eclectic mix of feelings about Obama on the part of the so-called Obots.
On the otherhand, the Sinclair supporters are ALL “anti-Obama”, although as John Freeman pointed out, they oppose him for various reasons, but they all oppose him nonetheless.
I conclude that the “Obot” people are about value systems and are outraged that such a lie has been promulgated to the extent that it has. For the Sinclairians, the situation is similar. Their outrage to them has moral justification, but in MY opinion they lack the ability to question and investigate Sinclair’s story. They WANT to believe his story. The HAVE to believe his story in order to join forces in “stopping” Obama. There is no independant thought among them. Like John Dean mentioned in his book about conservatives, they NEED a cult like figure to lead them, and Sinclair fits the bill, so does Orly, Hale and countless others for people of that mindset.
Thats my two cents.
BB….BRAVO! Great post…
I wish I believed for a second that any real analysis would change any minds. The tards, birfers, etc….well, evidence does not matter to them. They are driven by blind disdain for all things Obama, democrats…and heaven forbid, liberals.
But hey….there might be some out there who are just interested in both sides of the argument, even if I can’t fathom how anyone could find Lardo credible for even a second.
LOL…JF…just like old times….
Dueling posts……
I have lost my passion for this whole debate, but I still really feel a bond with the posters here.
BB….
DING! Mail to you.
I thought Victor was in love with Larry at one point..
Ya know .. one of those love hate relationships? lol
I think Larry got a tingle down his leg when Victor posted!
Dayum.. this person said, Larry said ,he had sex with the limo driver too..lol
http://fourredbullsaday.blogspot.com/2009/07/necessary-deep-examination-of-barack.html
tootin:: More garbage from trailer park clown :::::TOOTS!
Bandita:Dayum.. this person said, Larry said ,he had sex with the limo driver too..lol
These people just don’t DWELL in the “Rabbit Hole” they are the architects of the damn rabbit hole. What a bunch of bullpucky.
I’m beginning to think that I will soon be reading that Obama is a space alien who was sent by his planet to take over the Earth ala the mission of Klaatu in “The Day The Earth Stood Still”.
These anti-Obama movements have many faces, yet the underlying basis for all of them, in MY opinion, is the audacity and incredulity of having a Black POTUS. Many will TRY use logic and resoning like the person who wrote that post in the link you provided. The fact remains that their arguments are fallacious, salacious and inane. I could go on, but Bandita, I know you get the gist of what I’m saying. LOL
There he goes again. Lardass feels the need to obfuscate and throw smoke screens over the REAL issue of his OWN credibility which is being discussed here in a rather civil manner, in my opinion.
He has done this forever. Anytime there is a sharp focus on him and his lies, he tries to throw up a smoke screen and show fake outrage over something minute and mundane, with his laughable critiques of Obama.
Hey Bandita…any word on “Dr. Death”… aka Dr. Petersen’s current status after several complaints went to Pennsylvania medical authorities and physician watchdogs?
I’m just curious to know if her illegal acquisition of Donald Young and Larry Bland’s death certificates, which appeared on Lardass’ site for awhile and still remains on Jeff Rense’s site, was ever dealt with.
I will always believe that act was a violation of privacy and morally wrong. Sinclair used Young and Bland’s death certificates for monetary gain and to perpetuate the Great Lie that he still tells to this day.
Dr. Petersen is now the subject of my outrage over the Donald Young Lie and I will write a letter to the Justice Department to inquire about the legalities of such action from a Physician.
On another note: ::::::waving to gilligan::::: wherever you are!
http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/static/show.php?usernum=2442810129&frmid=8&msgid=1037902&cmd=show Ken Dumbear has given out the class assignment…..
I miss my little buddy gilligan.
BB — What makes Dr. Peterson’s actions even worse is that there was nothing on the DY death certificate that hadn’t already been reported on the news. She illegally obtained that copy for Larry just because he wanted it and she had a way of getting it. She had no altruistic motive to justify what she did.
BB,
I don’t know if this will help, but have you ever seen this particular post ???
WHO IS THIS PERSON? (repost)
Submitted by Pete on Saturday, 14 February 2009178 Comments
One of our most prolific tipsters ‘Sherman’ has forwarded us the below photo, telling us that this person is one of Larry’s most fervent supporters and is a MAJOR financial backer.
http://theregulator.net/?p=2806
http://theregulator.net/?p=4316#comment-34907
Bitches Brew
You seem to be saying that if someone has questions about about Obama they are racist. If that is what your are saying it is a good example of the point I made earlier.
I guess the majority of electors in the primaries who voted for Hillary Clinton over Obama were racists? And the 47% - or whatever it was - in the General Election who voted for MacClean were also racists.
Why not go the whole hog and say all those who voted for him were also racists. Its an easy charge to throw around isn’t it?
Glix:
Glix, my sentiments exactly, and thats why in my mind what she did was outrageous and CRIMINAL!
Kato:
Yes kato, I have seen that post. I think I will ask Zen and Meesh if it could be reposted again after we find out the status of the complaints filed against her. Thanks for answering my comment, kato.
scaramouche says:
July 26, 2009 at 11:20 am
Scaramouche: My quote was: These anti-Obama movements have many faces, yet the underlying basis for all of them, in MY opinion, is the audacity and incredulity of having a Black POTUS. Many will TRY use logic and resoning like the person who wrote that post in the link you provided. The fact remains that their arguments are fallacious, salacious and inane.
I have come to my opinion based on reading the comments and posts of a helluva lot of Obama Haters.
Let me give you an example. Years ago, I used to frequent the AOL political rooms. Somehow, regardless of the conversation du jour the talk would ultimately turn to race. The anonimity of that internet itself allowed for some of the vilest, most racist comments I had ever seen…ever!
Similarly, in the beginning of Larry’s You Tube days, he allowed HIS SUPPORTERS carte blanche> to do exactly the same thing as the anonymous AOL posters.
Free Republic, The beekeeper’s “regulatin’” blog, and not to mention Stormfront and other blatantly racist sites, frequently equate their outrage for Obama with racist rhetoric.
Just the other day, when Obama made the faux pas regarding the police officers in the Gates case, the entire thing blew up into a divisive race issue and saturated the news cycles for two days.
You ask, am I saying that anyone who questions Obama is a racist? No, I’m far too pragmatic to box a group of people into one category. All I am saying is that MANY of the people that oppose Obama pre and post POTUS appear to have an underlying resentment that a Black man is now the President of The United States.
I may not have been as clear as I should have been but I stand by my statement. The only revision would be…
Scaramouche:
My, my, a “reverse racism” charge Scaramouche? LOL I will admit my use of the term “all” was a generalization and I have thus corrected that generalization.
Warning…Warning, danger of exploding birfer heads. ANN COULTER CALLS THEM CRANKS
But, what does she know, she’s in the tank for Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYQr2a4vqqg
My two cents: Not everyone who doesn’t support our Democratic President is a racist. There are people who don’t support the Democratic platform for ideological reasons. However, the white supremacy people do not support Obama and they have infiltrated pretty much every organized protest movement and conspiracy based group such as the teabaggers and the birthers.
When someone says “I want my country back” what does that mean? Does it just mean I want the Republicans back in power? Maybe, but it might also mean “I want the country run by rich white men the way it used to be”. Of course, the rest of us are thinking “Sure am glad I have my country back”.
I actually listened to Ann Coulter…shocker, but what I really appreicated was Mike Huckabee. He said the Clintons definitely would have known and used it if Obama was not a citizen!!
As for anti-Obama vs racist. Not all anti-Obama people are racists. I agree with Glix. Some people just don’t like the democratic platform. There are true ideological differences. However, on a lot of the extreme anti-Obama sites, you will find racist comments/jokes/pictures…obvious racist content. I think that most people who are just turned off by his politics would probably prefer not to post/blog at such sites and so you end up with a core of people who have anger towards races other than White people.
You will note that most of the serious Republicans are not only not engaged with the birthers, but believe that it is a waste of time and would rather deal with concrete differences in philosophy.
Step right up folks and take your chances at being the last comment on the Regulator!
All you need to do to win is to keep spouting off about your political opinion that some of us could give less than a shit about. Anyone can play, anyone can win!
Zen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow ZeN, you bought us a new fan, I can’t wait for when the budget allows for central air conditioning!
It gets pretty HOT in here at times.
BREAKING NEWS!!!!
LMFAO
Just wanted to put things back into perspective for everyone following the Obama eligibility issue.
Neither Frank Marshal Davis, or Barack Obama Sr. are the biological fathers of Mr.Obama.
Barack Obama Sr. was a serrogate father and we don’t even know if Stanley Ann Dunham was his real mother (perhaps that info will be on the birth certificate?)
From another thread someone posted an article as to why FOX news will not cover the eligibility issue plaguing Obamas Presidency.
So, I will try to sum it up, and take it a step further from here.
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns part of the voting shares in the network as of 2005.
more..
http://pub29.bravenet.com/forum/static/show.php?usernum=2442810129&frmid=8&msgid=1039170&cmd=show
Everybody lighten up. An Obama joke.
HAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
“I remember the time I was kidnapped and they sent a piece of my finger to my father. He said he wanted more proof.”
Rodney Dangerfield
Ha ha ha.
Re: The United States has been High-Jacked by Saudi Arabia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From the tone, it appears that someone wrote this as a spoof, but the rocket-scientist birthers hopped all over it and bought it–lock, stock, and barrel.
Since this site is dedicated to exposing the lies of Larry Sinclair, who is dedicated to
ruining the reputation of President Obama and removing him from office, how can this site possibly avoid “political opinion that some of us could give less than a shit about”?
Zen that fan is PERFECT!! I feel the cool breeze from here.
:::feet propped up on my desk, chillin’ the phuck out:::: LOL
BB..
Obama looks at Sarkozy with a smile, “what secret stepping stones?”
Hahahahahaha…the “messiah” needs no stones to walk on water. LOL Too funny Joeymac, since Obama has shown just how fallible he REALLY IS in these last few months.
Longtimelurker, its a yin and yang thang. LOL
*pulls’ BB’s ying yang* LOL
Birther that attacked and intimidate Rep. Mike Castle “has a history” it seems.
The rest of the story
Hi Longtimelurker,
I consider many of the people that frequent theregulator my friends even though I have never met any of them in person. Many of them I have associated with for well over a year. I respect them and their various political beliefs.
In my experience the only purpose that is ever served by participating in an escalating political debate is someone being offended.
If you really are a “longtimelurker” you’ll know it’s not the first time I have stepped in and put a stop to it. Nobody wants to be the referee, but it kind of comes with the territory.
Longtimelurker says:
July 26, 2009 at 1:32 pm (Edit)
Since this site is dedicated to exposing the lies of Larry Sinclair, who is dedicated to ruining the reputation of President Obama and removing him from office, how can this site possibly avoid “political opinion that some of us could give less than a shit about”?
Re joeymac’s Obama joke in this comment:
http://theregulator.net/?p=4803#comment-40569
Here’s a cartoon along similar lines:
http://tuckerreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bo1.jpg
(Admins: FWIW, that cartoon has already been hotlinked a zillion times.)
bbl to throw out some observations re Bitches Brew’s outstanding post—particularly the link in the Update, which goes to Lardo’s revised Young Affidavit communications to the CPD.
The premier soprano of my generation. Here she’s at her best…absolutely beautiful.
EDIT: oops…wrong link. This one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E9Nu8JinM0
REEDIT: I haven’t been privileged to hear Marian Anderson or Jenny Lind, but it would difficult indeed, to surpass this voice.
Here’s a cartoon along similar lines:
That was cool.
Hi Zen:
Yes I’ve seen you step in before, and I understand your desire to maintain civility.
But I think that can be done by curbing incivility, not by trying to curb political opinion.
You might end up “throwing out the baby with the bath water.”
BTW, no serious criticism meant here. You do an incredibly thoughtful job generally, and the rest of us haven’t walked in your shoes at this site.
Bandita says:
July 26, 2009 at 1:48 pm
*pulls’ BB’s ying yang* LOL
Hahahah Bandita!
Hey, Douche…you are a chiseling freeloader. GET A JOB.
Larry needs to know if Moma got her food stamp card yet!
Also notable in Lardo’s Twitter:
I haven’t looked up what Rove had said, but I’ll bet he hadn’t said it specifically to Lardo! Sorry if that tweet of Lardo’s was posted before.
IIRC, Ila M. Peterson, MD, a pathologist at Main Line Health and Bryn Mawr Hospital in Pennsylvania, illegally obtained confidential medical documents on a second deceased person as well—either that or expressed her intention to do so or asked Lardo if he wanted them. That can be found in her e-mails to Lardo.
Yeah, thanks, joeymac, I really like that cartoon. Thanks for the video, though I’m not as big a fan of JB’s now as I was back in the day.
now bbl
Wingnuts spout of about Orly on Colbert’s show
Aww…it wuz just rough sex play…
Douche: “This sounds like fun!”
Hoo boy…
Hey, Dimwit, since you don’t believe you “lyin’ eyes” anyway, what effect would additional testimony do?
Hey friend ZeN, I shall keep my eyes on the prize from here forward.
Sorry, Zen. I’ll smack myself if I can the notion again.
Thanks Zen. Saw the shitstorm brewing late last night with an inflammatory post and have not posted all day since I didn’t want to be part of it. Thanks for throwing some ice on things.
I just got through watching a movie on TV called The Happening with Mark Wallberg. Between THAT movie and The Day The Earth Stood Still “tree huggers” around the world should grow exponentially! The concept of the movie was suspenseful, horrifying and at times humorous.
Sometimes, when I set my recycle bins out for my trash company to pick up, I feel I’m the only person in my sub-division that even cares about the planet. Nobody else even bothers.
Yep, I’m a “card carrying” tree hugger and have been for a zillion years! LOL
@KarlRove I have a book I would love to send you to read. Where can I get a valid address to send it to you?
Idiot. Trust me when I tell you this, Larry, Karl Rove all ready knows your story and knows you’re full of shit. You’ve bragged about “discussions” with the RNC; if they really occurred, Rove knows. And you want to know how he was told? At a staff meeting.
At a joint staff meeting of the RNC and the McCain/Palin Campaign which Rove chaired. We join the meeting, all ready in progress…
Rove: “Okay, thanks for that report. OpsResearch, you have anything for us?”
Director, OpsResearch: Yes, well, I do…uh…The Wright thing is DOA; Americans are apparently more understanding then we give them credit for…. Any way…the ‘Larry Sinclair gave Obama a bj and smoked crack” story is pure lies…
Rove: “Oh? Really!?”
Director, OpsResearch: “Karl, this Sinclair guy’s story cannot withstand any scrutiny. It would be debunked within five minutes of anyone releasing it….Sinclair’s of questionable character…and not because he’s gay, alone.”
Rove: “Oh. That’s too bad….that’s it?”
Director, OpsResearch: “Yeah.”
Rove: “Okay, thanks for that report….Who’s next? Okay,what’s the Finance Chairman have for us….?”
End of story.
For all the “political analysis” the idiot blogs, you’d think he understood, his story has been everywhere it’s going to appear or be spoken of. It won’t even appear in his some-day obituary.
LMAO YC!
Yeah, that’s about how it went.
Well, the book is released, available here in the states and in Europe. ZERO impact.
Nice try, Larry! What will you do for your next trick?
Time to sue the Bidens, perhaps?
joeymac says:
July 26, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Aww…it wuz just rough sex play…
Douche: “This sounds like fun!”
Idaho man sodomized by police Taser plans to sue
I’ll bet that was a shocking experience…..
ewwwwwwwwww.
Okay, I’m sorry, no more PUNishment.
Hi all!
YC~~ You forgot to email me and tell me where you got those shoes you had on in the meeting.
I would like to get my son some of those.
Be sure to email me .. k?
Bandita says:
July 26, 2009 at 10:13 pm
YC~~ You forgot to email me and tell me where you got those shoes you had on in the meeting.
I would like to get my son some of those.
Be sure to email me .. k?
Huh?
LMFAO
Re: the meeting.
You home yet YC?
LOL YC, I love it. I’d say you were “speaking truth to power”, but weall know that Lardass possesses NO POWER, outside of his Manson Like Cult. Great comment, YC.
Bandita says:
July 26, 2009 at 10:18 pm
LMFAO
Re: the meeting.
You home yet YC?
Glad you like “The Meeting.”
No, no, no; I’m still in the Caribbean…working on making this my home
Bitches Brew says:
July 26, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Idiot. Trust me when I tell you this, Larry, Karl Rove all ready knows your story and knows you’re full of shit. You’ve bragged about “discussions” with the RNC; if they really occurred, Rove knows. And you want to know how he was told? At a staff meeting…
LOL YC, I love it. I’d say you were “speaking truth to power”, but weall know that Lardass possesses NO POWER, outside of his Manson Like Cult. Great comment, YC.
Welllll…he IS an idiot. He sits on his fat ass, in his little mobile home issuing pearls of Larry-logik two or three times a day. Why his masterful ability of analysis doesn’t lead him to the obvious conclusion, is beyond me,
Thanks for the compliment, glad you liked.
Good article and cute baby pic here said to be Obama.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5907183/Right-Wing-US-conspiracists-question-Obamas-birth-certificate.html
uh-oh, the goddess (or bleached bimbo) that failed. (Sorry, Richard Wright.)
From the wingnuts
…I’m still in the Caribbean…working on making this my home.
Lucky Dog! I hope to be nearby by next winter (Bahamas).
Larry “Douchebag” Sinclair–cheating welfare queen.
If you’re the CEO of a corporation, why are you feeding on the taxpayer teat? Who put the fix in for you to scam benefits for which you are not entitled? I’m going to shine a bright light on your lazy ass (ugh, maybe not) until we, the people, get some answers. Your protecters too, will have to answer.
Hey, Douche, if you can afford to donate (unsolicited) books to Karl Rove, why couldn’t you pay to have your own tooth removed? If you can feed filet mignon, to your dog, pay for the expensive tests yourself that three (yes, 3) different cardiologists performed on you and whose advice you ignored anyway. Instead, you stiffed the taxpayer for the tab and used the coin money for meth and Pistol Petes. If the local medicaid and SSI officials won’t do their jobs, congress might.
Rise & Shine!
Toots!
trumpet:::: : ::: :::
FAIL! LOL!
Book Sale’s slow Larry?
If you had told people NOT to talk about “the book” in fear of getting sued by you, you would have had more sales.. hmmm
Word of mouth is the key.. but you put your strap-on over their mouths!
ffffffffFAIL!
Go ahead Larry!!
People Get Free Book Downloads from their Local Libraries!!
FREE!! LOL
Larry.. you might as well go the eBay route
If Larry was so close to his family, why didn’t he add his name here? Or one of his family members add it on his behalf??
What is the purpose of sending names into space?
Placing the names onto the STARDUST spacecraft was a public outreach effort. It allowed people to be personally involved with the STARDUST Mission and helps to promote public interest, awareness and support of the space program. It also provided a way to >>~~~>honor individuals by enabling them to be associated with mankind’s most advanced technological endeavor and to be part of the quest of the human species to reach for the stars.
FAIL!
http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/overview/microchip/namess.html
TABITHA SINCLAIR-GRASMICK
ANTHONY SINCLAIR
B. E. SINCLAIR
BARBARA SINCLAIR
BROOKE SINCLAIR
BRUCE SINCLAIR
DEREK SINCLAIR
DERRY SINCLAIR
DONALD SINCLAIR
DOUGLAS SINCLAIR
GERARD SINCLAIR
H. T. SINCLAIR
J. SINCLAIR
M. SINCLAIR
MARGARET NOREEN SINCLAIR
P. D. SINCLAIR
PHILLIP & NICK SINCLAIR
ROBIN SINCLAIR
SAM SINCLAIR
SHANON SINCLAIR
TERRENCE SINCLAIR
Wasn’t LarTard supposed to have just recently attended a big library conference so he could promote his pamphlet?
What’s that you say? He didn’t go?
He LarTard, you know that Libraries, if they stock the book at all, will place in either Fantasy or Abnormal Pyschology, right?
887 Humor & satire
Fatty Tuna Douche’s birthday: 9/26/1961 = 926+1961 = 2887
Class:
800 Literature
Contains:
Literature, criticism, analysis of classic writing and mythology.
What it says about you:
You’re a shallow, pathetic person who wants to make a big impact with your false actions. You have a lot to tell people (lies) and you’re good at making unique (often delusional) observations about everyday experiences. You can notice and remember details that other people think aren’t important (or never happened).
Find your Dewey Decimal Section at Spacefem.com
Howdy Evie!!!
It’s been a long time!
It’s really nice to see you again , welcome to The Regulator!
Welcome, Evie!
Hi Meesh,
I’ve been here reading. You all say everything I’m thinking so well there is no need for me to chime in. Great people and posts here. I’m just wondering which Tard would want a library to know they even read LarTard’s book let alone donated a copy to them. lol
“Howdy Evie!!!
It’s been a long time!
It’s really nice to see you again , welcome to The Regulator!”
Birther “crazy Eileen” on a call-in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmIxWRsuwbA
tootin::from trailer-trash *clown* he Toots:::::TOOTS!
*idiot* where do you see that he says the book is awesome? The only person who says that, is you.
AHA I see Larry doesn’t understand how library acquisitions work either. Larry should randomly select some libraries to call and ask them if they accept donated books. The answer will inevitably be no.
Larry’s books is going to be shelved in the nearest trash can. AHAHA
SLOB SEZ
yeah fuck off you bloated sack of shit, the ONLY reviews you accept are ones of retards that like yourself have no job, milk the system and think that government is repressing them………seriously slob fuck off and go to the laundromat at your trailer *park* you smell
Good ‘Toons
More Here
New Review Posted on Barnes & Noble.
It’s worth reading !!!
http://my.barnesandnoble.com/communityportal/Review.aspx?page=Review&reviewid=1181079
Elected Birthers on the Hill
By Mike Stark - Huffington Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1o1p_ly7Yw
Posted By Larry Sinclair at 11:56 AM
Hey Shit Sack…you’re really fucking delusional.
Bitches Brew,
Thank you SO much for making me laugh out loud today !!!
Where in the world did you find that video ????
Huffington Post ?
It was hilarious !!! Thank you for posting It !!!!
I especially liked the congressman that was running from the reporter, and the congressman shopping for office supplies for 20 minutes !!!
Kato, I get the feeling that someone very articulate and versed on all things Sinclair as well as one who really has read the book wrote the comment. By any standard it is an EXCELLENTLY WRITTEN, clear and concise summary of the TRUTH as any reasonable person would define “truth”. My hat goes off to that person.
When I grow up, I wanna write just like the person who wrote that critique.
Kato: Where in the world did you find that video ????
Huffington Post?
BINGO!! LOL Glad you enjoyed it Kato.
____________________________________________________________________
Kato says:
I feel the same way.
That was the best review I’ve ever seen written on Sinclair.
It’s worthy of a newspaper article or blog post.
Hopefully the person who wrote that review would consider contributing to “the Regulator” as a guest writer !!!
That would be exciting !
Kato,
Perhaps he already does.
AHA
How long until Larry whines and has it taken down? A day? Two days?
That review is a MASTERPIECE!
tootin:: More garbage from trailer park clown :::::TOOTS!
What in the hell was Larry doing at a Voc-Ed school? Is he finally thinking of getting an honest job? Personally, I doubt it. Since I don’t believe he was at a Voc-Ed school it follows he never met the two Latina ladies.
He’s extrapolating on a conversation he overheard between two Cuban women in line at the grocery store talking about their jobs. The part about the book is all in his mind.
Meesh, didn’t LarTard post previously that those two women had already stopped supporting Obama before he gave them the books?
I may be misremembering that, but I’m pretty sure he did!
Breaking News:::Weak-Minded People Now Have a New Media Outlet(s) to Further Example Their Lack of Brain Power
Dateline FL - 07/27/09
Regulator Freelance Staff (unofficial)
Sadly today it is once again demonstrated that weak-minded people use the internet, believe virtually anything and are scammed by even the most over-the-top, obvious scam artists.
Lawrence Wayne Sinclair, a notorious career-criminal convicted of multiple felonies and subject of an oustanding Felony Warrant out of Pueblo, CO, recently self-published an outlandish piece of fantastical fiction based upon his year-long delusional tirade against then-candidate and now President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.
Sinclair’s long story is well-documented (at least in the refutations of it scattered about the web), and thus it won’t be addressed directly here.
That vanity-press-type piece of publishing has been distributed to a few people around the continental US - though common sense would dictate that any of those who would read (let alone believe) such nonsense shouldn’t be free to visit a mailbox, let-alone have access to the World Wide Web.
Now, in his latest foray of preaching to the choir, Sinclair has converted two obviously less-than intelligent “friends” - lady’s who obviously have little-to-no mind of their own.
If Sinclair’s story about these women is to be believed, they were Obama supporters who, upon reading the book form of Sinclair’s changed their minds and are now awaiting the downfall of the sitting President. If that downfall relies on Sinclair, they will have a long wait.
To a certainty, there is an amount of racially-tinged Obama hatred within those who would line up and believe Sinclair, ala the “birther” movement. However, there are also those to whom a conspiracy theory in general would appeal, and it is clear that Sinclair’s fantasy tale attracts both kinds of enthusiasts.
Sinclair’s story has transformed and transmuted over the past 16-plus months with only one fact remaining unchanged - Larry Sinclair has done nothing whatsoever to prove, support or substantiate the claims he has made about his previous encounters with Barack Hussein Obama.
And he continues to not prove anything in his book.
So why do people believe his story? Why do they read his book so uncritically, giving it (again, assuming Sinclair is being honest) great reviews upon reading it?
The answer is multi-fold - but each fold is simply explained.
Racism - people hate Obama purely based upon his minority background. They cannot subsist easily with having him as President. At the same time, most are much too cowardly to express such hatred directly.
Well, in that case, some might ask - why not simply disagree with Obama vociferously based upon policy and politics, working towards ensuring Obama isn’t re-elected?
Simply that the hatred is so extreme - the wrongful passion so strong - that it is near-impossible for those so inclined to wait that long.
They must enact change now, as soon as possible - but by doing as little as possible (remember - they’re weak-minded cowards).
So - they support a “birther” movement. They support the “taxation without representation” tea-party effort. And, in their most desperate moments, they’ll cling to the wholly unproven and insupportable story of Lawrence Wayne Sinclair (ed. note - not his only name/alias).
In each and every case the vast majority of them know that each of those is a canard. But their hatred forces them to rail against the voter and electoral-college outcome, in desperate hope that the fear of being led by a freely, legally elected Black Man will come to an end.
And such is the case with these two - potentially “nice” - old ladies, assuming they really exist.
Deep down, they hold some racist sentiment - or they are simply broken in such a way that they are easily conned into believing the most outlandish of conspiracy theories.
This, too, shall pass. In spite of publishing and meagerly distributing his book, Larry Sinclair is of almost no noteriety. His fame is that of any person who - while adding virtually nothing of value to the world - has a minutely popular place for the majority of folks to visit on the web for a goof or a laugh, and a very very few come to believe.
Fear not, good readers. Yes, there are those that will believe Larry Sinclair. They, however, are the smallest of fringe minorities, less impactful than the most conservative wing of the current Republican Party in the US.
So, sit back and have the occasional chuckle at the exploits and missives of Larry Sinclair.
That, while not intentionally, is what he’s there for.
RuhRoh
Here’s another post where he speaks of the Hispanic teachers.
OWNERS OF TECHNICAL SCHOOL FIGURES IT OUT
It’s been a bad few days for birthers. Birther Major’s suit against his former employer kicked to the curb.
Thanks to Patrick McKinnon of http://www.yestodemocracy.com for the heads up.
McKinnon notes that the suit was pro se, no local attorney and no Orly; could it be that somebody was afraid of sanctions for bringing frivolous actions?
EDITED to add text.
This refers to Orly’s “kitchen sink” approach.
Dr. Oily thinks she has friends in high places. Because they are watching her on Facebook!
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25471.html
Thanks Meesh–OK, so they were starting to turn but hadn’t gone over the edge yet. If what LarTard said was even true. Agreeing with a crazy person is usually safer than disagreeing and it makes them leave more quickly!
My NEXT wedding is gonna be like THIS!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-94JhLEiN0
(I wish I could embed this YT video, BB, but embedding has been disabled
)
TJ Taygee
Is this a review of the tards?
Breaking News:::Weak-Minded People Now Have a New Media Outlet(s) to Further Example Their Lack of Brain Power
Bravo! Magnifique!
Ace tard said…
I hope people jump on the offer. For every library that receives a copy of this book, you can be guaranteed that at least 5 people will look at it. Meaning the library workers. And if 5 people tell other people, that is how word of mouth spreads.
Poor Ace tard. Perhaps he’s rather new to the Sinclairian fold over there. Perhaps he doesn’t realize that Sinclair and his zombies have been trying to “get the word out” for 18 months now with an absolute record of E-P-I-C- F-A-I-L-U-R-E.
The press doesn’t care, the cable and networks don’t care and the MAJORITY of Americans don’t care about a lie that a lunatic drug addled con man with an open warrant has told to scam the dumbasses that hate Obama and will do ANYTHING and pay ANYTHING to get him and his family out of the White House.
Larry Sinclair, Author, Entrepraneur, Bannana Nut, Baseball Card selling, TITTS failure, is a L_O_S_E_R.
Even the equally nut freak birthers are getting more traction with their even wilder story. Larry Sinclair, once again: YOU FAIL, YOU SUCK AND YOU LOSE.
Taygee, Bravisimo! Excellent take on the losers who support that loser.
Good old, gullible, Larry “the Waddler” Sinclair. The women were being polite, nitwit. The nano-second you were out of sight, the hysterical laughter commenced. Just because you spoke with these women once before, doesn’t mean they think you’re any saner today, then they though then. The word they use is, “loco.”
BTW, Puerto Ricans think you’re out of your ever loving mind. As one of my friends said, “anyone can write a book these days.” You’re proof positive, Larry
Resolution Proclaiming Hawaii Obama’s Birthplace Passes House Unanimously
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/house-to-consider-counter_n_245741.html
LOL
Great essay TJ, it should have been a lead post.
I knew if I hung out among the birthers long enough, they would reward me with something absolutely hilarious.
A “long-life” criminal I guess is a criminal that’s lives past the three-score-and-ten alloted to us. I guess that he is a tenured professor at an Ivy League school is proof positive of his criminal bent.
But, I’m afraid I don’t fathom the implication that a mere faculty member could control the admissions, but what do I know. I am also enlightened that non-citizens are not allowed into Harvard; that, for me, is a shocker.
Freakin’ rocket scientists.
Joeymac,
Not to mention that Obama began law school at Harvard in 1988 and graduated in 1991, and Gates was at Cornell and Duke during that period. He didn’t begin teaching at Harvard until 1991, but hey, what are facts to these people?
Resolution Proclaiming Hawaii Obama’s Birthplace Passes House Unanimously
Watch out for exploding birfer heads!
Be careful what you wish for. They wanted coverage and they got it in the past few days.
(1) RW icon Ann Coulter calls them cranks.
(2) “Crazy Eileen” is exposed as a certifiable loon.
(3) Their lies and talking points have been debunked on air–over and over.
(4) Orly had another BS suit thrown out without any serious consideration.
(5) CNN advised Lou Dobbs to “put a lid on it.”
…and now this. Not a good week to be a birfer nut.
EDITED: This just in! Bill O’Reilly says that they are FOS. Looking for the Video.
Gate[s] is a long-life criminal.
It was him who allowed O. in Harvard knowing he wasn’t a citizen
=====================================================================
So I guess Officer Crowley became a criminal of sorts as well when he lied on his police report. It looks like the police acted, well, “stupidly”. Don’t worry. I am sure Obama will not demand an apology-LOL
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32169213/ns/us_news-race_and_ethnicity/
“The officer who arrested Gates, Sgt. James Crowley, said in his police report that he talked to Whalen soon after he arrived at Gates’ home. “She went on to tell me that she observed what appeared to be two black males with backpacks on the porch,” Crowley wrote in his report.”
“Whalen’s attorney, Wendy Murphy, said her client never mentioned the men’s race to Crowley and is upset by news reports she believes have unfairly depicted her as a racist. “
Dedicated to Birthes,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coCDRfh0AWg
Poor Lartard still doesn’t get it.
I love getting a rise out of that pecker!
Yes, Oh My, it seems that there were multiple lies in the police report as noted here.
In my opinion, people focused to much on the racial aspects of this case and failed to confront the real problem: abuse of police power. It would have been just as wrong if prof. Gates had been white, yellow, or red.
Obama Hawaii born, insist Isle officials
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090727/BREAKING01/90727082/Obama+Hawaii+born++insist+Isle+officials
By Dan Nakaso
Advertiser Staff Writer
In an attempt to quash persistent rumors that President Obama was not born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, Hawai’i’s health director reiterated this afternoon that she has personally seen Obama’s birth certificate in the Health Department’s archives.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”
On Oct. 31, Fukino originally tried to put an end to the belief among so-called “birthers” that Obama was not born in the United States and thus was ineligible to run for the office of president.
Despite Fukino’s statement today, the issue continued to resonate from Capitol Hill to the national airwaves to the blogosphere.
A congressional resolution introduced by Hawaii Rep. Neil Abercrombie commemorating the 50th anniversary of Island statehood was postponed today apparently because of a “whereas” clause noting Obama’s Hawaii birthplace.
The line “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961;” has been construed by some who believe Obama is not a U.S.-born citizen as a thinly veiled attempt to get Congress to affirm Obama’s U.S. citizenship.
So-called “birthers” denounce the notion that Obama was born in Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, despite court rulings and statements by Fukino and Hawaii’s Republican governor, Linda Lingle.
Abercrombie’s office had already issued a statement today announcing the House’s unanimous approval of Abercrombie’s resolution when Minnesota Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann rose today to object to the vote, saying there was not a quorum present.
Before Bachman’s objection, Abercrombie spokesman Dave Helfert had said some birthers believe the resolution “means the House of Representatives is on the record that Hawaii is the birthplace of the president of the United States.”
The House later voted unanimously 378 to 0 to approve the resolution.
“Fifty-five people didn’t vote for whatever reason,” Abercrombie spokesman Randy Obata said. “Apparently there was no objection in the final analysis.”
Bachman ended up voting in favor of the resolution.
Reach Dan Nakaso at dnakaso@honoluluadvertiser.com.
Say What? And no population explosion? Friggin’ socialists!
(I’m joking, of course)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385×343468
Hi everyone. I know I’m late for the party, but BB very nice report. Good post.
Sinclair is STILL the piece of shit he has always been I guess. I will definately have to buy a copy of that rag, on the advice of my attorney. Ewwww!
Hello Meesh, Zen, Neonzx, Gilligan, YC, Bandita, James, Kato, Ruh Roh, Glix, Fwmami, Joeymac, Johnreader, JF, my dear friend Democratista and everyone else. I don’t wanna sound like I’m accepting an award like Sinclair The Liar did…LOL
I miss you guys and needed to holla! Has anyone heard from Del? I sure miss my Bronx homie. Del, if you’re lurking, drop me a line at kaystreet67@gmail.com
Pete, come up for air and say hi to us sometime. LOL
Carry On….
tootin::from trailer-trash *clown* he Toots:::::TOOTS!
Wait, the two hispanic ladies Sinclair writes about. Aren’t they here in GA? Hmmm, that means that SinkLiar is no where near the tornado ravaged tin can where he lives is he? LOL Those medical tests must have taken place in GA. Hmmm…I’m just sayin’. I might be wrong because I don’t keep up with all of his lies, but I coulda sworn he met those ladies in GA.
Always scamming the system huh IDIOT? Ewwww!
Howdy KStreet!
So nice to see you again, if you wish the email addy to your Bronx homie, let me know, I’ll be glad to give it to you by email.! I am certain DEL would not mind, by the way, I am shouting out in cyberspace to my dear friend (((((((Del)))))))….
♡ ♡♡ ♡♡ ♡♡ ♡
♡ ♡♡ ♡♡ ♡♡ ♡
Lookie Lookie: Governor tours Port Orange Tornado District
http://www.news-journalonline.com/newsjournalonline/breakingnews/gov072709.htm
You’d expect Larry to set a land-speed record flapping his flip flops in a ghastly flab flapping waddle to see Gov. Charlie Crist at the LIGHTHOUSE POINTE COMMUNITY CENTER, but he’s completely oblivious to the governor, the mayor, the city council members, the fire chief, the TV cameras, the reporters, the photographers, and who knows who else. But mostly the TV cameras. But nope, Larry is no where in sight. Again.
Where IS Larry? He missed the opportunity to be around the MSM and Conservative Politicians? Oh my.
Hi KStreet!
(Hi to you too, DEL!)
Howdy and Welcome aboard internetwarriorqueen!!!!!
Ohhhh my fuck….this is the typical SLOB follower…TOTALLY FUCKING RETARDED TRAILER TRASH
SLOB go blow a homeless passed out person you sack of shit.
Oh nooes! Congress is in on the conspiracy!
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/lead-birther-bill-sponsor-votes-to-recognize-hawaii-as-obamas-birthplace.php
The House resolution to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Hawaiian statehood — which included language recognizing the state as President Obama’s birthplace, in a none-too-subtle jab at the Birthers — passed this evening by a 378-0 vote.
internetwarriorqueen,
FatBoy says on Twitter that Gov. Crist was in front of his house er trailer
Poor Larrd is trying his best at some “viral” PR campaign but in his case it is viral in the original sense, a germ of a disease…I’ve been having too much fun with the Birfers lately but if anyone has a copy of the Larrds pamphlet, hook a brother up. The mods have my email…Can’t wait for Orly on Colbert. The Tards at Plains seem to think she’ll really outwit Colbert:
Tard 1:
Orly could even point out that just as in a mouth where there is the intrusion of a tooth, out of natural order and position, an extraction is necessary, it is better to let a dentist like herself do the job, than the common man, because it will be less bloody, so the MSM needs to stop spinning and join her demanding the evidence, lest this disintegrate fast in this Country and end up in violence…
Tard 2:
Wow, I love the tooth extraction analogy. If he calls her a dentist she can point to TWO degrees, ask Colbert for ONE, and cite that “trying to get Obama to release his biorth certificate is like pulling teeth!” If she handles it right she could disarm him for the rest of the interview!
Yeah- she’s such a sharp stick…
Again the threats of violence…The only violence you’ll get from these armchair revos is if the local 7-11 runs out of cheetos AND the slurpee machine breaks down…
Trailer trash chiseling welfare queen whines:
Yet Crist told victims there was no money to offer them…
Hey, slob, aren’t you freeloading enough, already? Pay back the money stolen from SSI and medicaid–and, while you’re at it, get a job. That’s what normal people do.
Now that Caribou Barbie has exited the stage, we have only intellecually challenged birthers for comedic relief. Here, they are assailing O’Reilly asserting that Obama is a citizen, and that the birther’s are “bogus.”
Yes, genius, the freaking urbandictionary really carries a lot of legal weight. Legally blonde.
I guess the birfer don’t have a clue what Colbert’s shtick is. He’s not going to call her out or argue with her, he’s going to take it even further. I envision him going something like “So we don’t really know where Obama was born. Personally, I think he’s from outer space.” Something along those lines.
I wish somebody would ask Taitz how many Presidents’ birth certificates she has seen so far.
Poe would have had his hands full applying “rationization” to the tortured logic of birfer loons.
Featured theory now is that Obama was not the offspring of Ann Dunham, but that he was born of an African wife of Obama Sr. and adopted in to the marriage. Except, that they were never married, and the divorce was a sham to give legal cover to Obama.
But, wait. The real father of Obama is Frank Marshall Davis, or Malcolm X, except that would make him a NBC by two citizen parents.
I W Davis Probation Detention Center
265 I W Davis Rd
Jefferson, GA 30549
This will be your first hit for IW Davis on google and try doing a search and the one IW Davis in Illinois is 2.5 hours from Chicago. Methinks IW = Lardo…
Okay people who have left here because of some offense….we want you back…you know who you are. Don’t let someone else make the rules for you. Don’t let them take up space in your head. If you don’t want to be here, fine, but it should be your own decision and not because someone is owning your space.
Democratista, I think Larry is being Punked…
I looked up “I. W. Davis” too earlier and thought someone is yanking his chain…
Might be Heywood Jablowme again
Hawaii Again Declares Obama Birth Certificate Real
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/28/hawaii-again-declares-oba_n_246018.html
HONOLULU — State officials in Hawaii on Monday said they have once again checked and confirmed that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen, and therefore meets a key constitutional requirement for being president.
They hoped to stem a recent surge in the number of inquiries about Obama’s birthplace.
“I … have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen,” Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said in a brief statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Why does LarTard keep posting the same few emails he’s gotten about his book? I thought it was flying off the shelves! New comments about it should be stuffing his inbox daily! So what’s with the recycling?
Birthers back Hawaii-Obama resolution
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/Birthers_back_HawaiiObama_resolution.html
It’s symbolic, but Democrats have scored a victory [of sorts] over nine House Republicans who signed on to the so-called “Birther” bill — getting them on the record in support of a resolution that explicitly states that President Obama was born in Hawaii.
None of the nine — Reps. Marsha Blackburn [R-Tenn.], Dan Burton [R-Ind.], John Campbell [R-Calif.] John Carter [R-Tex.], John Culberson [R-Tex.], Robert Goodlatte [R-Va.], Kenny Marchant [R-Tex.], Randy Neugebauer [R-Tex.] and Rep. Ted Poe [R-Tex.] — objected to the unanimous approval of a resolution honoring the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s Statehood last night.
The key clause, cleverly inserted by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii): “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii;”
Few of the nine have actually questioned the president’s Hawaiian birth certificate, just demanded more rigorous documentation of future candidates birth certs. So they probably don’t mind the vote.
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) briefly stalled the vote for a quorum call — which prompted a string of erroneous blog posts accusing her of standing with the Birthers.
The only problem I see with Dr. Oily and the Colbert report is that she might want to see the edited version before signing a release….
Ed Hale needs $1500.00 in the next few days.He took down his $5,000.00 request and put up the new one….maybe he has a plan to ask for less money every week? This is going to pay his airplane tickets to PA for the court appearance… so he says……
littlelulu-
Ed Hale has decided to forgo continued retainer of the Philly attorney and, instead, represent himself. He’s seeking the $1,500 for him and Caren to travel for the Aug 7th court hearing.
Last night on the show he said Orly would be there with him, but that’s not true as she is scheduled to be out of the country from Aug 1st-24th.
“The hallmark of a conspiracy theory is that a lack of evidence for the theory is taken as yet more evidence for the theory.”
The National Review said this…
Hm…
I think Oily wants to distance herself from Ed……He is messing around with her case in CA trying to get Pidgeon in on it now…She does not want his help..Ed is calling it the DREAM TEAM! If you notice Dr. Oily does not mention Ed once on her website…no mention of monetary help or any of the interviews that she has done with ED….
AHAHAHA Somehow I missed this last night:
Who the hell would call his or her mother to read a description of Obama’s penis to her? Did this call culminate in hot mother/child phone sex?
Yeh James, these tards are something else, this other one caught my eye too!
Mad As Hell, FatBoy’s graphic designer for the BOOK is a HOOT and a great Mom too!
It does not matter how old your son is, what kind of a Mother focuses on these topics with a son? D-I-S-F-U-N-C-T-I-O-N-A-L!
From MY mother, I would receive a hard smack.
Sinclair’s Supporters all have a few screws loose.
They are practically geting aroused reading the “physical description”
that’s sick.
HAAHAHAHAH joey!
O’Lielly kicks burthers to da curb.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auGtiD0tCmY
Meesh,
What the hell is wrong with these people? Larry counts among his readers people who think the world is ruled by a cabal of shape-shifting lizard men, and others who have no problem reading blowjob tales to their mothers and children. What a freakshow!
James,
The basic supporters FatBoy has left are these crazed lunatics, who focus more on the least important issues of his FABRICATED lie.
C’mon the President’s penis? Quoting Mad as Hell “That last page alone makes the entire book worth the read!”, this woman is a certifiable nutcase!
Now back to movies…
Next thing, they will be discussing Brad Pitt to play the lead part again.
Hey Guys,
Remember when Sinclair stated a few months ago that he was awaiting word from someone who was a member of Barack Obama’s Gym for “confirmation” on the President’s Penis Size ?
* I wish I could find the orginal quote….I searched long for it but couldn’t find it..
I know for a fact that Sinclair said something to this effect…I just can’t find Sinclair’s orginal post
Well…Someone else had commented on The President’s Penis a few month prior…
Maybe Sinclair referenced this article for inspiration for his book
Alan Cumming Comments On The President’s Penis
http://jezebel.com/5142668/alan-cumming-comments-on-the-presidents-penis
Alan Cumming thinks that our new President, Barack Obama, has a large, ahem, unit:
“I think great leaders, charismatic leaders and men who are so confident and who have achieved so much, usually have big penises,” Cumming tells New York. “I think there’s a correlation between the level of confidence, the level of the way a man can hold a room and the way he conducts himself in life, with his penis size — with his comfort with his penis size. So much of male psyche is taken up with how big your cock is; it’s a huge deal in our lives, and so when you’re confident about your penis size, it shows. Well, just look at [Obama]. Just the way he’s so kind of elegant and very confident in his body and himself. Also, someone told me that they worked out with him in a gym in Chicago, and it was big.” [NY Mag]
Kato,
That would be quite interesting, especially since Larry has said numerous times that Obama is “hung like a white boy.”
I suspect that Larry is hung like a eunuch. I think he even had to stuff his panties with tissues just to get that pathetic little bulge going in those horrific pics he posted.
James says:
July 28, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Kato,
That would be quite interesting, especially since Larry has said numerous times that Obama is “hung like a white boy.”
I suspect that Larry is hung like a eunuch.
I wonder if Fats realizes what he’s saying about himself with the comment, “hung like a white boy.” Then, of course, there’s the obvious racism inherent in the comment regarding the size men of color are stereotypically endowed with.
Larry hung like a eunuch? I’ve heard it referred to as “IBM” (itty bitty meat)
kato says:
July 28, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Hey Guys,
Remember when Sinclair stated a few months ago that he was awaiting word from someone who was a member of Barack Obama’s Gym for “confirmation” on the President’s Penis Size ?
* I wish I could find the orginal quote….I searched long for it but couldn’t find it..
I know for a fact that Sinclair said something to this effect…I just can’t find Sinclair’s orginal post
I remember that post, kato. I’ve looked for it as well, without success. Perhaps Meesh has it tucked in one of her many files. I’ve always wondered why Fats needed confirmation of the Presidential size. I mean, he supposedly had it in his mouth as well as his hand, wouldn’t he remember if Obama was big or small, cut or uncut?
EDIT: For those unfamiliar with the terms “cut” and “uncut:” Cut = circumcised. Uncut = uncircumcised
YC,
AHAH When Larry says “hung like a white boy,” he may only have himself as a reference point. I’d imagine that such a tiny thing lost amid a mass of blubber can be pretty tough to locate.
Thanks Yankee Clipper.
Now I know I wasn’t imagining things…
it looks like this comment is a phony one, because FatBoy made it a point to list postal/zip codes in various posts….who knows why, he just did.
I cannot see that particular zip code anywhere? If the book was in fact received on the 15th, these show 3 shipments prior to that date.
Here are the zip codes at various times, I cannot see 35242.
James says:
July 28, 2009 at 1:59 pm
YC,
AHAH When Larry says “hung like a white boy,” he may only have himself as a reference point. I’d imagine that such a tiny thing lost amid a mass of blubber can be pretty tough to locate
Can you imagine Larry in a mens room, standing in front of a urinal, pulling out a magnifying glass and a pair of tweezers so he can find his “endowment” and take care of business? lol
kato,
You’re welcome!
GOP headache: The birther issue
Politico
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/25444
Daniel Libit, Lisa Lerer Daniel Libit, Lisa Lerer – Mon Jul 27, 6:34 am ET
When lawmakers return home for recess in August, they can expect to hear tough questions from constituents on the economy, health care and government spending.
But Republicans are preparing for something else: the birthers.
As GOP Rep. Mike Castle learned the hard way back home in Delaware this month, there’s no easy way to deal with the small but vocal crowd of right-wing activists who refuse to believe that President Barack Obama was born in the United States.
At a town hall meeting in Georgetown, a woman demanded to know why Castle and his colleagues were “ignoring” questions about Obama’s birth certificate — questions that have been put to rest repeatedly by state officials in Hawaii, where the birth certificate and all other credible evidence show that Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.
When Castle countered that Obama is, in fact, “a citizen of the United States,” the crowd erupted in boos, the woman seized control of the gathering and led a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. The video went viral; by Sunday, it had been viewed on YouTube more than half a million times.
And birthers say members should expect more of the same in the coming weeks.
“Absolutely,” says California resident Orly Taitz, the Russian-born attorney/dentist who has become a kind of ringleader for the movement. “It is a very important issue, one that politicians should have taken up a long time ago.”
Moments after speaking with POLITICO Saturday, Taitz posted a call to arms on her blog:
“I believe it is a serious concern and I hope that each and every decent American comes to town hall meetings with a video camera and demands action,” she wrote.
Having seen his colleague Castle come under attack, Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) is taking no chances.
“Before I got back to Michigan before the break, we’ll go through it, so that we’re versed in it,” Hoekstra said recently. “Just like anything else, if you see a hot issue … it’s sort of like, ‘Let me go take a look at this and see what the status is.’”
Hoekstra believes there’s no “compelling case” questioning Obama’s origins. But after talking to Castle about his town hall, he knows that he’d better be ready with an answer.
The trick: What do you say?
Of the various approaches a put-on-the-spot pol can take, each carries its own risk of alienating constituents. Pick up a pitchfork in the cause of this conspiracy theory, and you risk damaging your reputation in the mainstream while aligning yourself with a movement some regard as having racist undertones.
Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.), co-sponsor of legislation that would force candidates to show their birth certificates, was widely mocked after he told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that Obama is a U.S. citizen — “as far as I know.”
However, members who decide to challenge the conspiracy theory, as Castle did mildly, risk ticking off a shrill minority who can upend their events and then post the video on the Web.
And those who try to split the difference may find themselves getting doubly burned.
At a Wyoming town hall in April, birthers jumped on freshman Republican Rep. Cynthia Lummis.
“I’m not questioning your concern,” Lummis told the crowd, according to the Wyoming Eagle Tribune. “I am questioning whether there is credible evidence.”
The congresswoman ended up asking for anyone who had “evidence” to send it to her.
At a walk-in meeting in Sen. Tom Coburn’s Washington office, birthers gave the Oklahoma Republican’s chief of staff nine pages of documentation in support of their claims. The group later billed the meeting a success on one of Taitz’s blogs.
But when asked about the meeting, Coburn spokesman Don Tatro said that the office was simply trying to be “polite” and that “it is possible to mistake politeness for agreement.”
According to his office, Colorado Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn has received 33 inquiries about Obama’s origins, with 10 coming in over the past week.
So far, Hoekstra hasn’t faced any such questions.
“When you’re in a state with 15.2 percent unemployment,” he said, “most people have other things on their mind than this.”
But as if to illustrate the touchiness of the subject, Hoekstra quickly added: “Not that this isn’t important.”
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) has also tried to find the elusive middle ground.
“They have a point,” he said of the birthers last week. “I don’t discourage it. … But I’m going to pursue defeating [Obama] on things that I think are very destructive to America.”
Inhofe put out a statement Monday clarifying his comment:
“The point that they make is the Constitutional mandate that the U.S. president be a natural born citizen, and the White House has not done a very good job of dispelling the concerns of these citizens,” he said. “My focus is on issues where I can make a difference to stop the liberal agenda being pushed by President Obama.”
Out-party politicians have long had to deal with conspiracy theorists on their side — the people who think that the Clintons killed Vince Foster or that the Bush administration helped orchestrate the Sept. 11 attacks.
“Twenty-five percent of my people believe the Pentagon and Rumsfeld were responsible for taking the twin towers down,” said Rep. Collin Peterson, a Democrat who represents a conservative Republican district in Minnesota. “That’s why I don’t do town meetings.”
But the birther phenomenon may present a bigger challenge — a potent blend of race and politics, fueled by conservative TV and radio pundits, and played out in a day when all that stands between a town hall meeting and Web omnipresence is a $100 flip cam.
Republican pollster Whit Ayers says that a member confronted with birther questions should immediately pivot the conversation back to big issues.
“You simply indicate that in a country where our fiscal policy is driving us toward bankruptcy, where we are wrestling with major issues of health care reform and fighting two wars for our safety, you don’t have time to deal with wild conspiracy theories,” he says.
That’s the approach House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana takes.
“On that issue, I’m pretty distinctive that the president is from Hawaii,” he said. “I just don’t know where he’s coming from on health care.”
Such a response might satisfy many, or even most, but Taitz says that until Obama is removed from office, America’s other problems cannot be addressed. The fact that a few members of Congress have taken up her cause, with 10 Republicans signing onto Floria Republican Rep. Bill Posey’s legislation to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, has only encouraged her to buckle down in the fight.
As Taitz sees it, Campbell, who represents her congressional district in Southern California, was moved to co-sponsor the “Birthers’ bill” for fear of people like her.
Campbell spokesperson Muffy Lewis flatly denied that being the case, saying the issue of Obama’s birth certificate is a low priority in the congressman’s district. Plus, Campbell has stressed that the bill would apply only to future candidates — and is really just about avoiding these kinds of controversies in the future.
“It really wasn’t as much about constituents as it was his own principles,” said Lewis. “He thought it was a common-sense bill. Castle had a major issue [in his district], but it hasn’t been much of an issue in ours.”
But Taitz said that lawmakers everywhere should be prepared to “resign or be removed” if they “do not have the guts to stand for the Constitution and this country.”
Asked whether Republican lawmakers should be “afraid” of the birthers, Taitz said: “I wouldn’t say the word ‘afraid.’ I think they should be willing to resign or be removed. That is what they should do. … Resign if you do not have the guts to stand for the Constitution of this country.”
Taitz has made nine trips around the country to rally support for her cause. In March, she traveled to Washington to personally hand out packets of documents to senators in the Hart Senate Office Building. Additionally, she says she has sent documents by certified mail to each of the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, arguing that Obama is “totally illegitimate to be president.”
While the movement could be “politically threatening for particular Republicans,” Taitz says that the GOP as a whole has a chance to gain from it if it takes the right course of action.
This is wildly off topic but really cool….A choir from Slovenia:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzJwhHvQmG0
Kato and Yankee
That comment that you are referring to, was never copy/pasted on the blog, I did ask where this link came from to the posters who were discussing it, and they could no longer locate it.
Unfortunately when this occurs, there is nothing that can be done. I did comb through FatBoy’s blawg and I had never read it myself, only heard about it.
This is why I often ask where stuff is taken from so I can save it on file.
Heres’ the actual discussions:
These are the non-linked accounts or discussions of this:
As you see it’s linked to nothing.
Thanks Meesh !!!!
* Note for file: I will no longer look for it.
If Meesh can’t find it, it can’t be found !
Regarding the Presidential Phallus, I recall seeing an article posted by a gay publication online in California. Apparently, Larry was interviewed during his trip for the polygraph test… in the interview, Larry did divulge some details on the “physical description”.
Anyone still have that? I’d be interested to see how it jives with what he’s written in his booklet.
Kato
I did find this posted at Larry’s by some tard, perhaps this is what they were talking about?
but it was re-posted in February, tards often do this
Meesh !!!
Those are the quotes I’ve been looking for !
It was HEIDI (& mandinkawarrior)who were discussing the issue !!
Thanks Meesh !!!!
Neonzx
Are you referring to this? “The Breaking Obama Gay Sex & Drug Scandal By Paul Ramirez
The description of the Presidential Phallus can be found here, as told by SickLiar:
http://wesawthat.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/ramirez_sinclair_interview_22february2008.pdf
FatBoy’s interview back on February 22nd of 2008! Hmmmm I wonder if he forgot about this?
Gayborhood Calendar Page 4 interview
pasadenagayborhood.com A PAUL RAMIREZ PRODUCTION
Meesh, he must have forgotten it, because it has several details that contradict the story he’s telling most recently.
RuhRoh
That’s ok NOW he has it in book form, there’s no going back on the interview, that he gave in February of 2008 to pasadenagayborhood.com, back then he was more of an *idiot* if you can believe it.
I think he was *fueled-up* when he gave that interview.
Meesh,
You don’t say! Larry caught in a lie! My, my, what is this world coming to?
James,
I wonder if he gave Paul Ramirez a copy of the BOOK?
Someone needs to post that link on B&N and goodreads
I thought Larry said that Obama just showed up at his hotel room?
In that interview Larry says he called? hmmm
Did you guys notice that In Sinclair’s interview with Paul Ramirez,
He NEVER mentioned Donald Young….
Thanks, Meesh… that’s what I was looking for. I certainly would hate for that interview/article to be forgotten.
Bandita–exactly. That’s the most damning discrepancy from that interview!
He also made no mention of paying Obama to buy the drugs–in this version they were some sort of gift.
There are a few other changes to the story in that interview as well! It’s like that page in Highlights, when you were a kid–look long enough at both stories and the differences all pop out.
Meesh,
Please save a copy of that Paul Ramirez interviews to your files.
I have a feeling it’s going to be scrubbed, once Sinclair gets word that we’re talking about it.
Thanks
Ruh Roh,
…And there’s no mention of Sinclair being contacted by “Mr Young”.
Also, what was interesting about that interview is that Paul Ramirez mentions that Sinclair was on the phone with Gloria Allerd.
I wonder what was up with that.
I also wonder her reasoning for NOT representing him….Maybe she sensed something was off about him.
Kato
Not to worry I have had all 4 pages saved for quite some time now.
Sinclair was extremely sloppy in this interview and also as previously stated he proved to be MORE of an *idiot*!!!!!!!
This was BEFORE he had legal representation, he was a loose canon, I was waiting for THE BOOK to be out.
Kato
Back in February of 2008, Sinclair claimed he tried to retain Gloria Allred as his legal counsel, she apparently backed out.
He blamed it on the obots.
Larry will claim Ramirez is lying, for sure. But I would find it hard to imagine… especially on the physical description.
This interview appears to include the earliest reported statement by Sinclair of “black man with a white man’s dick.” — Larry has used that statement (with minor tweeks) consistently in the year that followed.
Did Lynne get her copy of the booklet yet?
Thanks Meesh !
from goodreads…
I knew LarTard had already said those Latina women were Obama haters BEFORE he gave them the book. And I found the post. it was July 16th, 2008
Bandita, “Laquasha” sounds “contrived”. Not sure if thats one of Lardass’ zombies or Lardass himself, but the name and the “dialect” is certainly PURPOSEFUL. LOL its really quite hilarious, since I have not seen anyone write or hear anyone talk like that since the ante-bellum south stories like “Gone With The Wind”. LOL Hilarious!
Do you hear that sound ???
That’s the sound of MSM (Print & Telivision) responding to Sinclair’s Accusations.
Compared to the Birthers stories, Sinclair tale is of no interest to anyone.
Meesh & Zen
Ding…….
Yeh Kato *crickets*
Do you guys remember this crazy post???? The apostrophe disaster is bad enough, but read what *it* had to say…
Those of you who have been following this story are well aware of how Obama/Axelrod employee’s and surrogates have circulated faked statements from me and faked newspaper articles about me. So it is only normal to suspect they will try to edit the physical description of Obama’s genitals sent to Michelle. I made sure to take measures that would make that impossible for the Obama camp to get away with.
A week prior to sending the written description and letter to Michelle Obama I emailed the physical description of Barack Obama’s genitals to three (3) different people with the instructions that they save the email, header and all documenting the description and the date it was sent. I am in a way looking forward to Obama and or his idiot advisers attempting to edit the description and spin it trying to discredit me. I am confident that if they attempt any such act, it will blow up in their faces.
That’s correct folks, there are three people across this country other than myself and Michelle Obama who has the physical description of Barack Obama’s genitals. Hey, my momma didn’t raise no fool!
Now what would be in the best interest of Michelle and Barack Obama is for Barack Obama to hold a press conference immediately and once and for all admit that my statements that Barack Obama sold me an eight ball of cocaine on November 6, 1999; that Barack Obama smoked crack cocaine in the back of my limo and again in my Gurnee, IL hotel room on November 6 & 7, 1999; and that Barack Obama did engage in homosexual sex with me in the back of my limo and again in my Gurnee,IL hotel room on November 6 & 7, 1999 are ALL TRUE!
Barack Obama’s admission is not going to give any legal grounds for removing him from office, nor do I believe the election results would have been any different had Obama admitted the truth before the election, about his drug use and sexcapades.
The Obama’s will have to decide how they want to deal with the truth, but they both know as do Baracks advisers, that I have been telling the truth about Barack Obama from day one.
Let the games begin on this final stretch in exposing this lying, cheating, murdering fraud!
NO DOUBT MICHELLE LETTER PICKED UP BY WHITE HOUSE
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/2009/01/no-doubt-michelle-letter-picked-up-by.html
UPDATED @ 9:45 pm JANUARY 27,2009: I received a comment earlier that mentioned another comment made on this blog under the same name as the White House Employee signing for the Michelle Obama letter. Well it turns out that M. Naldo posted a comment on this blog at 9:31 AM on January 26, 2009. Well it is interesting that a White House staffer would make such a comment.
M Naldo said…
Dumbass Punk
January
26, 2009 9:31 AM
Original Post
After posting some concerns about the signatures and times on the Postal Service records, I decided to call the White House directly (202-456-1414) and ask for Mateo Naldo (more so to verify that such person was in fact employed there) well the White House confirmed Mateo Naldo is employed at the White House, so I am certain the Michelle Obama letter containing the description of Barack Obama’s genitals was received.
It has also been confirmed that “Transition Team” is the name of the post office which also sits on the White House grounds.
I thought I would share a cute joke with you as well.
One evening Obama , thinking he was being funny, said to Michelle ,’Perhaps we should start washing your clothes in ‘Slim Fast’. Maybe it would take a few inches off of your butt!’
Michelle was not amused, and decided that she simply couldn’t let such a comment go unrewarded. The next morning Obama took a pair of underwear out of his drawer. ‘What the Hell is
this?’ he said to himself as a little ‘dust’ cloud appeared when he shook them out.
‘Michelle’, he hollered into the bathroom, ‘Why did you put Talcum Powder in my underwear?’ She replied with a snicker. ‘It’s not talcum powder; it’s ‘Miracle Grow’!!!!!!
Nope, methinks he forgot about that interview
Orly’s confirmed that she will be on a segment during The Colbert Report tonight, Comedy Central, 11:30pm EDT.
(damn, I’m out of popcorn)
THanks Kato
I received your *ding*
everyone to B channel==========>
RuhRoh!
Ding back!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SLOB Larry , did you show obawa your 3 inch erect penis? and what did he say? The **HUNG Like Hamsters **website wants to do a feature on your micro penis!
Larry asked his doctor at age 12..
I masturbate with both hands. Is it normal?
The doctor replied..
Most males (and females) masturbate with only one hand. More switch hands than use both at once.
I wonder if LarTard has seen this story:
http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0709/man_convicted_of_threatening_obama_007fcd54-9f1c-40de-a066-d766893c8c17.html
How come Larry says his book is 194 pages on goodreads?
202 pages on B&N.?
RuhRoh!
“Pinhead” O’Lielly is dumber than the birthers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXpyQ6POqiw
Some comments on the youtube page.
There’s a
New Post!
by ZeN my friend
Join the FUN!
[...] enter…The Donald Young obloquy. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Political Analysis: When Do Political [...]
[...] The Dog That Didn’t Bark: The Donald Young Lie Submitted by Bitches Brew on Friday, 24 July 2009280 Comments (Reproduced from The Regulator) FULL DISCLOSURE: “Bitches Brew” was a pseudonym [...]
[...] The above gem is indeed a combo Joker-face/Adolf Hitler Obama. And as for the Donald Young gravestone at left: The gravestone marked “R.I.P. Donald Young” refers to a choir director from Chicago that many wingnuts believe was murdered to cover up homosexual escapades and crack use between Obama, a man named Larry Sinclair, and Young. Really, people think this. [...]