Sinclair Publishing Is Dissolved
Submitted by ZeN on Tuesday, 6 July 2010170 Comments
Click image to see how Larry dissolved Sinclair Publishing.
Home » i. the cesspool
170 Comments »
Leave a comment!
ImageChef.com Poetry Blender
Funny stuff !!!
ImageChef.com Poetry Blender
segundo
ImageChef.com Poetry Blender
Shit. I’m not fist, segundo or turd. I’m just this lousy 4th, 5th or zillionth.
Well Sinclair Publishing Inc’s default of the lawsuit and apparently losing the lawsuit was self inflicted.
I wonder if the con man is going to spray some of that stuff on himself in the near future and timidly go where many fraudsters before him have gone: underground.
I’m just here to round-out the six-pack!
And Cao is female. Her mug shot is floating around here somewhere. It’s not very flattering, but then mug shots rarely are.
Cao has a record!! Why am I not surprised?!
Have any of the other defendants filed responses to Parisi’s case? Rense, Amazon, Books-a-Million, Barnes and Noble??
I really want to read Rense’s response!
LMK, I suspect that anyone that hangs around or supports Lardass’ lies is not exactly a “model citizen”.
Sinclair is a seasoned criminal and con man. I’ve heard it said time and time again: “Birds of a feather…etc.”
So, Cao, Rense, Tomas, Goofy Wells, et al, are mere extensions of his nefarious personality. They all appear to be liars, grifters, schemers and cowards.
I wouldn’t be suprised if Rense is evading service on this case like the whining sniveling coward I imagine him to be.
LMK,
I know that some of the other parties have filed for an extension of time to respond.
Docket update here: http://www.politijab.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=152952#p152952
Nothing important; several lawyers admitted Pro Hac Vice and Amazon given unti Aug 2nd to respond.
Thanks LMK…someone is missing…
06/15/2010 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR served on 6/7/2010, answer due 6/28/2010 (Oparil, Richard) (Entered: 06/15/2010)
06/15/2010 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC. served on 6/7/2010, answer due 6/28/2010 (Oparil, Richard) (Entered: 06/15/2010)
06/15/2010 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC. served on 6/8/2010, answer due 6/29/2010 (Oparil, Richard) (Entered: 06/15/2010)
06/15/2010 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BARNES & NOBLE INC served on 6/8/2010, answer due 6/29/2010 (Oparil, Richard) (Entered: 06/15/2010)
Where’s Rense’s answer? Frigging coward ass wuss.
When you turn a light on a cockroach, they tend to scurry for cover.
This lawsuit is going to shine some pretty bright lights on these folks.
Hey nice pic on the front page!
WTPL said “This lawsuit is going to shine some pretty bright lights on these folks.”
I can’t wait!
lWTPL,
What do you expect from an anti-semite and Holocaust denier like Rense. Disgusting POS. And Larrdo wanted this vile slimeball to write the intro to his book.
http://www.adl.org/main_Extremism/Rense_Web_Site.htm
Rense Web Site Promotes Anti-Semitic Views
Posted: March 17, 2009
Jeff Rense is an Ashland, Oregon-based Internet and satellite radio host who maintains a virulently anti-Semitic Web site, Rense.com. His radio show promotes a wide variety of conspiracy theories, often focusing on extraterrestrial aliens but including a great deal of anti-Semitism expressed both by Rense’s guests and Rense himself.
Rense.com, which claims to receive over ten million hits a month, contains thousands of regularly updated links to articles and posts on the Internet, many of which focus on Jews, Zionism, and the state of Israel. For example, the site has featured posts entitled “Coming Zionist Police State” and “Zionist Jewish Talmudic Massacre of Palestinians.” Rense.com has also posted at least one quote from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, an anti-Semitic tract that claims that Jews are plotting to take over the world — connecting it to a statement by former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
“A lot of Zionists were in the slave trade too. A tremendous Zionist/Jewish participation in that filthy business.”Many of the posts on Rense.com link to some of the most virulent anti-Jewish writings on the Internet. For example, the site regularly links to RealJewNews, an anti-Semitic Web site run by Milton Kapner, a rabidly anti-Semitic street preacher who goes by the name Brother Nathanael and describes himself as a Jewish convert to Greek Orthodoxy. Rense.com has also linked to Judicial-Inc, which offers a regularly updated collection of articles accusing Jews of plotting every perceived ill in the world, from the mistreatment of Native Americans to the promulgation of pornography, to even being Jack the Ripper, a late 19th-century English serial killer. On its front page, Rense.com often features anti-Semitic images by the conspiratorial artist David Dees, including some that explicitly deny the Holocaust. The Web site also maintains an archive of Dees’ images, many of which are explicitly anti-Semitic.
In addition to its links to the Web sites of other anti-Semites, Rense.com posts original articles. Several praise Kevin MacDonald, the anti-Semitic California State University, Long Beach professor. Other articles argue that Judaism is an exclusivist “racial credo,” and that American Jews staged the 9/11 terrorist attacks for their own financial gain and to induce the American people to “endorse wars of aggression and genocide on the nations of the Middle East and the theft of their resources for the benefit of Israel.” Another article, produced exclusively for Rense.com, argues that Zionism is “the belief in the ‘Jewish’ state, the primary one being the United States, and of secondary significance, the state of Israel.”
A disclaimer on Rense.com denies official endorsement of any of these views, but Jeff Rense’s assertions on the show make clear he is himself anti-Semitic. For example, during July 2007 broadcasts, Rense claimed, “A lot of Zionists were in the slave trade too. A tremendous Zionist/Jewish participation in that filthy business.” He also alleged, “The Neocons are essentially servants of the Zionist/Jewish/ Rothschild cartel that is pushing the Middle East agenda,” and referred to Zionists as “evil Satanists.”
Rense has also hosted overt anti-Semites on his radio show, including Ted Pike, an Oregon-based anti-Semite, who denied on the show that the Nazis had built the Auschwitz concentration camp or used it for the murder of Jews. In addition, Rense has offered a platform to Lyndon LaRouche, an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist, and to Hector Carreon, the founder and editor of “La Voz de Aztlan,” an anti-Semitic online publication.
Prior to hosting his current radio show, “The Jeff Rense Program,” Rense hosted “Sightings,” an Internet radio show that focused on alleged human contact and sightings of extraterrestrial aliens. (”Sightings” was first known as “The End of The Line” and was broadcast on an AM channel out of Santa Barbara, California.) Before that, Rense claims to have worked for 12 years as a local television news director and anchor at various locations in California and Oregon. Rense.com first appeared in early 2000, when “Sightings” was renamed “The Jeff Rense Program.”
When you turn a light on a cockroach, they tend to scurry for cover.
This lawsuit is going to shine some pretty bright lights on these folks.
LMK,
That’s a LOT of suits…and then there’s Larrdo in a XXXXL t-shirt, a pair of garish Wally World swim trunks and a pair of smelly flip flops.
Nothing important; several lawyers admitted Pro Hac Vice and Amazon given unti Aug 2nd to respond.
Definitely a pretty vile character in his own right. Doesn’t bug me as much as Hal Turner - who La-Rye also did an interview with. But he’s pretty bad.
And for a guy who (pretends to) claims he wants to get to the bottom of issues, all he was was a mouthpiece for the con man. He didn’t do any serious checking or truly dig into stuff when callers called in to raise issues with La-Rye’s BS or before his shows. He’d cut to the next caller or allow the con man to side step the issue and then market the stuff with links on his site.
A testimonial to his stupidity is the forward to the pamphlet. I’m sure his lawyer has filled him in on how dumb that move was. A lot of risk hoping to get rewarded by a career criminal. Looks good on him.
Hopefully, it’s a Jewish lawyer who ultimately deposes him.
WTPL: Hopefully, it’s a Jewish lawyer who ultimately deposes him
Ahhh, that would difinately be JUST DESERT!
WTPL,
Neo-Nazi Turner is even more disgusting that Rense, but we haven’t heard much from Turner since his own legal troubles started. Turner’s had two hung juries, and he’s due to go back on trial in August:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/crime_courts/040510_Third_trial_for_North_Bergen_shock_jock_Hal_Turner_will_begin_Aug_9.html
Turner’s not doing too well in bankruptcy court either.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/061510_North_Bergen_shock_jock_Hal_Turner_loses_a_round_in_bankruptcy_court.html
But even before Turner’s first criminal trial, he had to admit he was an FBI informant, which tends to diminish his cred among the sleazy bottom dwelling world of neo-Nazis.
WTPL,
AHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ah, the irony….can you imagine Rense being asked a question and he responds with his well-worn underlined and highlighted copy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
Hopefully, it’s a Jewish lawyer who ultimately deposes him.
I read some pretty awful stuff on Hal’s site (or stopped after being horrified).
That’s one downside with the internet. It seems to help these whack job bigot haters congregate and because they see these other haters like themselves congregating, it’s kind of an assurance or approval for their ignorant views and the way that they are - that it’s ok to be like that and hate people because of their race, religion, sexual orientation or whatever because they’ve found others who do. As much euphoric hope went along with Obama’s campaign, I saw too much of the converse dark side thrive along with it that I thought had been in remission since to 60s. It sure was disappointing to see. And then we have a con man like Sinclair come along and try to cash in on part of it.
So,
I wonder if LarTard will start the “I need plastic surgery scam”?
Oh wait he can’t cuz then no one will know who he is…. LOL…
Did Rense “word” his forward and interviews in such a way as to avoid possible future prosecution? Though I think he’s an ass, I think he’s smarter than Sickliar and may know what line not to cross to avoid lawsuits… Just a thought.
m.i. crazy-
Rense used the word “alleged” near the beginning of his forward before stating any of Larry’s claims.
m.i.,
It doesn’t make any difference. When I search Amazon on “sinclair obama,” this comes up:
Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? by Lawrence W. Sinclair and Jeff Rense (Hardcover - June 15, 2009)
It’s not until I click on the link that I get:
Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? [Hardcover]
Lawrence W Sinclair Author), Jeff Rense (Foreword)
They’re forever intertwined. And by writing the foreward, Rense knew or should have known what was in the book.
Did Rense “word” his forward and interviews in such a way as to avoid possible future prosecution? Though I think he’s an ass, I think he’s smarter than Sickliar and may know what line not to cross to avoid lawsuits… Just a thought.
neon,
If Rense thinks that using the word “alleged” in his foreword is going to absolve him from liability, he’s got another thing coming.
If he had doubts about the veracity of Larrdo’s book, and of Larrdo, he could have and should have politely declined/refused/run like hell from his frequent guest. But Larrdo did repeat his Parisi claims on Rense’s radio show, so Rense has left himself wide open for the libel, slander and defamation lawsuit.
gilli
Hal Turner is screwed seven ways from Sunday. Disclosure that he was a snitch/agent provocateur has queered him forever in the supremacist culture, and his refusal to stay within FBI proscribed boundaries has forced that agency to cut all ties.
Now, he is faced with another expensive trial on the Federal charge, and, I believe, another one on a State of Connecticut charge without any means of raising money and without gainful employment. It must really suck.
The irony is that all he had to do was listen to his FBI handlers on what he could say, and he could have continued receiving his “30 pieces of silver” on a regular basis, plus scamming racist for contributions. But no, like Douche, no one could control him, so now he is paying the price and whining. Just like the whiney Sidewinder.
Not surprisingly, he is taking a page from the book of Moma, the Bjerkmanns and other thieves by running up a huge amount of credit card debt and stiffing the issuers for it. Someone should have told him about the recent bankruptcy act that makes it harder to avoid contracted debt.
Here it is..
did rense dick-tate that to larr and larr transcribed it that poorly, or is rense as illiterate as larr?
As for T Patrick Murray’s* “full site” and “HD video” drop, I’m guessing he really meant 06/30/2011. so, won’t need to check it for the next 11 months, everybody! You’re welcome.
*I have a favorite site for which the abbreviation is “TPM” –> Talking Points Memo dot com. Senor Murray is wholly undeserving of usurping that acronym (in my mind, anyway)…
I don’t think the foreword is completely in the clear - per the Parisi complaint. But the 20 or so radio interviews probably have a lot more meat because he can’t be as guarded as he discusses it.
The fact that they haven’t been able to serve Rense may not be purely ‘accidental’
I dunno, maybe I am a bit dense, but in what Rense says above I do not see him saying that it is true, but that Larry should be heard.
It seems carefully worded to avoid collusion. If he backed Sickliar with money knowing Sickliar was doing a scam, that may be different, but I don’t see how the above puts rense in the same libel/slander boat.
Thank you, Meesh.
Yes, he does have the right to MAKE allegations without the threat of criminal prosecutions, but availing himself of that right does not absolve him from the responsibility of being truthful, or he can suffer sanctions. President Obama has decided that he has better things to do, so he hasn’t bothered with a civil action. Dan Parisi, however, has decided to make Sinclair pay for libeling him. Hooray.
Due to you elevated sense of “moral truth,” “credibility,” and “devotion to reality,”(?????) you repeat the abundant revelations of lizard people, space aliens, cuchamongas and sasquatch sightings. People need to know about these things! Undoubtedly, you exercised the same discernment in assessing Sinclair.
It seems, at first glance, that this is where Rense abandons good judgment and fails to condition his statements; he asserts Sinclair’s lies as established facts. However, he is secure in the knowledge that the President won’t bother with calling him to task. Donald Young, as a deceased person, cannot be libeled, so he is also safe there.
Notice that here he doesn’t make any blanket assertions of veracity of the claims presented on the radio; he merely “tracks” the story. Because, if he made any claims of truthfulness here, other people that were defamed on the radio would have cause for action.
What a hoot. No one has appeared to dispute the existence of Bigfoot or lizard people either.
Have they ever accept any invitation to appear on this whack job’s show for any reason whatsoever?
Who with any credibility would appear on an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist’s show? This guy has enough trouble cutting through the bigotry and fantasy BS he’s all caught up in without challenging him to join two factual dots about Obama.
He talks about “journalism” and even describes Sinclair as one (grotesquely absurd). But when he read his book and checked into the story, did it not occur to him that in the entire book there isn’t one single shred of credible hard evidence provided by Sinclair (as the hotel points statements have been bluntly debunked as anything but credible). Nothing on Obama and nothing on Donald Young to substantiate the career con man’s story about his involvement with either of those men. Not phone record, a receipt, an air ticket, a credit card statement, an email - absolutely nothing.
When a real journalist like John Crewdson sees that, a real journalist knows what he can and cannot say about it. A real journalist’s eyebrows would have to be very raised with alarm bells going off like crazy - in the best case for Sinclair. But Rense claims to know what a journalist is and does and accepts this story as something worthwhile that is evidence of corrupt mainstream media? That’s pure BS and most know it - very probably including Rense.
And it may well be reinforced by Parisi’s difficulties trying to serve Rense. Shouldn’t Rense want to step forward and clear his name? He can’t claim he doesn’t know about it with links to Sinclair’s rebuttals to Parisi on the main page of his site.
The real test of where Rense really stands will come when Rense ultimately has to answer the suit. There will be no more BS, pretend fence sitting and posturing then. He’s either got to get behind Sinclair who has no evidence OR he’s got to take a position like he got duped. I suspect the response by Rense and his deposition will be considerably more black and white than the games he’s played promoting this story and trying to cash in on it.
m.i.,
Rense repeats what Larrdo says in the book, on his blogs and websites and on 20 or 30 of Rense’s broadcast. He even uses the same phraseology as Larrdo. He also help Larrdo get donations for his various activities and promote the book, Larrdo’s blogs and websites (all of which FatBoy used to raise money), and promoted Larrdo’s run for Congress (with attendant fundraising). Rense’s involvement with Larrdo goes well beyond what he wrote in the book.
It’d be up to a jury to decide Rense’s culpability, if any.
I dunno, maybe I am a bit dense, but in what Rense says above I do not see him saying that it is true, but that Larry should be heard.
It seems carefully worded to avoid collusion. If he backed Sickliar with money knowing Sickliar was doing a scam, that may be different, but I don’t see how the above puts rense in the same libel/slander boat.
And he wrote the foreword of the book knowing what was in it (or should have known).
Jeff Rense interview with Larry Sinclair regarding Dan Paris
Obamarama The 2nd Rense Sinclair Interview Pt. 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bPwH8_piaA&feature=related
The second interview of Larry Sinclair by Jeff Rense regarding the polygraph test and results by whitehouse.com. Sinclair stands by his story and asserts that the truth will eventually come out even in the MSM. This is part 1 of 4. In part 2 Sinclair alleges that the Obama campaign paid $750,000 to rig the test and/or hush up the results if not favorable.
* If you don’t feel like listening to the entire interview, start @ the 6:20 mark
Pt. II here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8g5Iq...
WTPL,
Hell, JD Hayworth got heat for appearing in an infomercial. I cannot imagine any mainstream candidate for ANY office appearing on Rense unless they were already an antisemitic conspiracy theorist who is also a Holocaust denier–and maybe believes in Lizard People. I’m thinking the likes of David Duke and Don Black’s son–except for the Lizard People stuff.
Who with any credibility would appear on an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist’s show? This guy has enough trouble cutting through the bigotry and fantasy BS he’s all caught up in without challenging him to join two factual dots about Obama.
Thanks Meesh !!!
Wikipedia isn’t the greatest source but should be sufficient to get the point across on Rense & Journalism. Rense knocks the journalism of the mainstream media in the foreword. As some may recall, Rense also even made a plea on his show that he thought Sinclair was such a great journalist that Rense hoped someone listening to the show would hire him.
“Journalist” Sinclair provides no reliable sources on his stories about Obama and Donald Young. None whatsoever. And he provides very little to support his accusations (not allegations) of Parisi.
Sinclair is the only witness to his own story about Obama and Donald Young. He has two phone numbers of an unnamed person who supposedly gave him the tip about Parisi/Axelrod. Yet many times Sinclair crosses the journalism line by suggesting what he’s accused Obama and Parisi of is a fact.
We’ve “corrected” Sinclair on many incorrect factual aspects of his claims and story. Sometimes, he changes his story while many times, he doesn’t. He’s rarely published any corrections over the last two and a half years nor has he amended factual errors in his book after they’ve been brought to his attention. I’ve never heard Rense get into them either on his radio show unless it was maybe a caller who probably got cut off.
I think Parisi makes the case and we’ve witnessed it with the Obama/Donald Young business where Sinclair has reported these crimes as a fact - beyond a mere allegation.
Now those are pretty fundamental journalistic standards and ethics that can be found nearly anywhere and are adhered to by most journalists.
How could Rense constantly raise journalism as a concept he subscribes to with his listeners and in the foreword of Sinclair’s book and recommend Sinclair as a “journalist” (to pump the credibility of Sinclair’s story), while pointing the evil conspiracy finger at the mainstream media for not publishing Sinclair’s story (for journalism reasons they gave Sinclair) but overlook Sinclair’s blatant lack of journalism and massive lack of evidence and witnesses to support his story?
Only Rense can answer that question for himself. But I suggest Parisi will be looking for that answer and it probably will be a tough answer for Rense to come up with. It’s tough to claim one thing when you’ve actually being taking action doing another that flies in the face of the claim.
Why is Amazon still selling their Kindle version of SickLiar’s book??
http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-ebook/dp/B002PSD322/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2
This is dedicated Ruh Roh & Meesh
Thanks for all the introductions to new music. I’m a fan now……..
I love when you guys introduce me to new music !!!
I like hanging out whith you guys.
You taught me to appreciate Marc Broussard, James Blunt, Leonard Cohen, etc, etc
….people I probably would have never heard of if it wasn’t for you.
Thank You.
I’ve Been Loving You Too Long - Marc Broussard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0DPCSRKld4&feature=fvw
(OHOH I hate when this happens Kato)
“Embedding disabled by request”
Marc Broussard “Try Me”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK-A7Fl2iU4
James Blunt - You’re Beautiful (Live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjUaWiy_QXc
Gilligan: It’d be up to a jury to decide Rense’s culpability, if any.
I agree. As much as I find Rense repugnant, and unless Parisi can prove “real” support, (like financial,) I think Rense will avoid legal actions.
Interesting; in the first Rense interview someone photoshopped a Star of David on Obama’s lapel.
Rense’s forward:
Rense is screwed. Seriously screwed. IMO, while IANAL, Rense can’t escape culpability by using the word “allegedly” in the forward of the book. Rense wrote that sentence in the forward of a book that blatantly libels Parisi. In addition, Rense has repeatedly allowed Sinclair to slander Parisi on his radio show. Since Rense hasn’t ever said that Larry could be wrong about Parisi, Rense become an accomplace by facilitating Larry’s lies.
Parisi is suing on 2 main points:
1) Sinclair and Rense accuse Parisi of accepting $$$$ from the Obama admin and
2)Sinclair and Rense call Parisi a pornographer. Rense clearly calls Parisi a pornogrpher.
While Rense could possibly (but not likely) get past point 1, he can’t get past point 2. He blatantly called Parisi a pornographer.
It will be very interesting to find out if Rense earned $$$$ from book sales.
Can I just say that Rense’s badly photoshopped pic scares the crap out of me every time I see it. It is wrong on so many levels! Creepy…….
I had no idea that Rense has avoided being served in this case.
BTW…
Meesh, Thank you SO much for transcribing the forward of FTD book.
That took you a lot of time & trouble.
THANK YOU !!!
sometime my comments are going into moderation…
I can’t figure out why.
anyways,
I got two comments hanging out in the moderation bin….thanks
Kato,
Thanks! I’m glad you’ve found some new music you really enjoy!
And I love how you post the classics for us, too! The middle-aged and older of us know they’re out there, but sometimes we either don’t own them or haven’t listened to them in a bit. And the youngsters here may not even be aware of the classics of soul! Ah, the halcion days when actual talent made you famous instead a a cute butt or good abs!
It’s always fun for me to learn what everyone else is enjoying and get new ideas or reminders, too!
Kato
Methinks the reason some of you kids’ comments go into “moderation” is because of the Sinclair “apostrophe” syndrome I decided not to use “Meesheemey’s” because of this…. I kept going also in moderation too, see the site even dislikes him.
PS Kato, No problem for that “Dense” foreword, anytime!
Thanks Meesh !!
I’m back to “kato”
Someone shared this one with me - from the great COHEN, I would like to share it with you too! ENJOY!
“Always”
(Oh friends, .. don’t matter if you’re a man or a woman. If you’re in love
with somebody, these are the words that you got to learn to say. Now
listen carefully. Here it comes…)
I’ll be loving you always
with a love that’s true, always
When the thing you’ve planned
needs my helping hand,
I will understand, always, always
Days may not be fair, always
Yeah but that’s when I’ll be there, always
Not for just an hour,
Not for just a day,
Not for just a year, but always.
I said that I’ll be loving you, always
with a love that’s true, always.
When the thing you’ve planned
needs my helping hand,
I will, I will understand, always, always
(Oh that’s pretty … that’s pretty too … Oh darling)
The days may not be fair, always
Yeah but that’s when I’ll be there, always
Not for just a second, or a minute, or an hour,
Not for just a weekend and a shake down in the shower,
Not for just the summer and the winter going sour,
But always, always, always
(Ok if you don’t want to quit, let’s try it one more time)
I’ll be loving you, always
with a love that’s true, always.
When the thing you’ve planned
needs my helping hand,
I will understand, I will, I will understand, always, always
The days may not be fair, always
(Don’t worry, baby)
That’s when I’ll be there, always
Not for just an hour,
Not for just a day,
Not for just a year, but always.
Meesh, I have been having comments go to mod, but have always been “LMK”.
So, I looked up FTD’s book on Ebay. There are 4 sellers with a total of 15 copies for sale. Thing is, when you click all 4 of the seller’s names, ebay says that the sellers have no listings! Weird!!
The prices asked for FTD’s book are hilarious. One seller wants $234.17 for the book!
Meesh !!!
I’m enjoying this tune.
I didn’t know Mr. Cohen had so much “soul” in him !
I’m digging the hammond b3, piano, and drums…and that slide guitar. oh my god !
See this is what I’m talking about.
I LOVE hearing new music….
Kato - Yeh he has a lot of music, he was first a poet and then became a singer, a Canadian Bob Dylan. Leonard Cohen Bio
LMK - I think at times, if you have more than one link - your comment will go into moderation. I’ll keep watching.
Summer Sounds for the Kool Kids
Sly and the Family Stone - Hot Fun in the Summertime (1969)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NVVe1DkVsQ
Betcha By Golly Wow- Stylistics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alvEUFJtMw8
Detroit Spinners - It’s A Shame (1970)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5VaRSEvq8U
Thanks Meesh!
Kato,
I have to figure out how to upload a live recording I have of Broussard covering Tower of Power’s ‘Don’t Change Horses’. You will like it, I think!
I’ve got a great live recording of something by someone you’d never believe was him here, too. LOL! Don’t want to give that one away as you’ll definitely think differently of the artist after hearing it! It’s a medley of that artist’s two most popular pop hits turned on their heads. I’ve copied this for more friends than anything else I own! They all are shocked (and then pretty thrilled) when they figure out who/what it is!!
So now I have a little project to complete for you!
Thanks Ruh Roh !
I’m looking forward to hearing it.
As I said earlier, I enjoy when you guys introduce me to new music.
Thank you SO much !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Meesh,
After this, I might not be able to give up my apostrophe:
Larry SickliAr screeches:
Yard Sale set for tomorrow has been cancelled due to the fact that everything I was putting up for sale has been sold. Thats the kind of Yard Sale’s I like.
And neon sending an agent to the yard sale had nothing to do with it….and if it was PJ’s rikker, Larrdo could try flirting (and failing).
Of course, I wonder if this is like Larrdo’s previous “sale’s.” You know, that he “sells” his worldly possessions and they never leave Larrdo’s residence, and show up again in a new place.
LMK, Thanks for spotting that, eyes like a hawk.
“Allegedly hired” os OK
but “internet porn merchant” is not.
Tisk tisk.
Isn’t sinclair the COB of Sinclair Publishing ?
anyways…the registered agent (Moma ?) has been in the hospital, and he KNOWS this.
Sinclair thinks people are idiots…..
I needed to read these documents again….
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32796471/Dan-Parisi-et-al-v-Larry-Sinclair-et-al
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33760800/Response-to-Opposition-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33712859/PLAINTIFFS%E2%80%99-RESPONSE-TO-MOTION
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION
* If Sinclair feels his company wasn’t properly served, then why did he respond to Operil ?
I think we’ve covered this previously.
I wondered if he was confused with Florida state law so I looked up Florida State law (assuming below is a good and accurate link)
I haven’t looked hard for the best link for DC either (don’t care to waste my time) but here’s a quick one:
I don’t see where there is a requirement under DC court rules (where the case resides - not Florida) that a registered agent of a business must be served before a corporation can be considered legally served. The con man is an officer of Sinclair Publishing Inc and as such, Sinclair Publishing Inc corporation has been legally served based upon what I’m aware of via the affidavit of service with the court.
When the court decided that Sinclair Publishing Inc was in default, you can be sure that the court reviewed if Sinclair Publishing Inc had received lawful service of the complaint (via the affidavit of service in the docket, etc).
The funny part right now is that Sinclair Publishing Inc is deemed to be in default by the court. Period. If Sinclair wants to take issue with that on the internet, that’s great but it will do him no good with the court because he doesn’t have a “lwa degree” and is not a “lwayer” as he once claimed. The only type of person who can raise this issue with the court under DC law is a lawyer representing the “dissolved” Sinclair Publishing Inc who have been lawfully found in default of the lawsuit by the DC court. As Sinclair doesn’t want to get a lawyer for his dissolved corporation, the issue is over unless Sinclair backs down and admits he was wrong and begs the court to reconsider.
End of story. It looks like another bunch of nonsense from the lwayer.
Thanks WTPL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I knew YOU would know…….
Meesh,
I think WTPL’s comment just went into moderation.
He probably was updating it, when this occured.
Thanks
The President and Chairman of the corporation posts the complaint on his personal blog yet he’s trying to claim the corporation was not properly served?
I’m sure Judge Leon will be amused.
Larry does not want to lose the rights to his ’story’. That’s why he is screeches about improper service. It reminds me of an episode of Seinfeld.
Peterman has decided to publish an autobiography and delegates Elaine to ghost write it. Elaine’s first draft is summarily dismissed by Peterman, who finds it boring, and tells Elaine to be a little more creative. She presents an anecdote from Kramer about how he took a short cut through the subway to return the very same pair of pants he was wearing, and Peterman loves it. Peterman purchases the rights to all Kramer’s stories. When Kramer goes out with his friends, and discovers he no longer has any stories he “legally” can share, he tries to get out of the deal.
As I said a few threads ago, as soon as Larry mentions that he is aware of the lawsuit, he can not claim to be ignorant of it.
If he said nothing (nearly impossible for the Douche)he might be able to claim he was unaware.
I think Rense has taken this route. I am unaware of him mentioning anything about the lawsuit or his connection to it… (But I may be wrong again)
Larry is such a fucking idiot. Even apart from the fact that he was quite obviously served in his capacity as an officer of the corporation, doesn’t Larry remember declaring “Sinclair Publishing, c’est moi” (to paraphrase Louis XIV)? By his own design, Larry IS Sinclair Publishing (at least in his own lwa-fevered mind). Plus, broadcasting your knowledge of a lawsuit multiple times a day, each day, for weeks is hardly the best way of denying that you’ve been served.
M.I.-
Rense has links to Larry’s recent escapades surrounding the case:
At rense.com
BadPoet….I’m a HUGE Seinfield Fan
Here are SOME of my favorites !
Seinfeld: The Cleaner (Newman)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRTBVPgHM3Y&feature=related
Kramer’s Karate Sessions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2CTihQy_XE
Embedding disabled by request
Kramer at calvin klein
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iViyKfcI1IQ&feature=related
Can you imagine this argument being presented to the judge:
Sinclair: “I demand an extension as Sinclair Publishing Inc has not been legally served!”
Judge “Upon being served, didn’t you rush off and dissolve Sinclair Publishing Inc effective July 1, 2010 so that you, the Chairman of the Board of Sinclair Publishing Inc, could represent it personally?
http://tinyurl.com/2775xu9
Judge: “But now you’re saying to the court that you, the Chairman of the Board of Sinclair Publishing Inc, didn’t know about the lawsuit?”
Judge: “And I can’t legally discuss Sinclair Publishing Inc with you in this court because the law says that Sinclair Publishing Inc must be represented by a lawyer”
Sinclair: “Well I have a lwa degree and a asters degree. The DC bar just won’t let me practice lwa because of my life long career in crime. I think that’s unconstitutional.”
Judge: “Have you applied to the DC bar? What is unconstitutional?”
Sinclair: “No, I got a tip at 2:30 in the morning about two and a half years ago from someone I don’t know but I REEEAALLY trust them and they said David Axelrod wouldn’t let the DC Bar approve me.”
Sinclir: “I know the lwa better than most and when I say it’s unconstitutional, that’s the way it is because I know a lot. I’m never wrong even when it’s proven that I am. And I’ve always been a good and truthful fraudster.”
kato-
you forgot SOUP NAZI! :p
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2lfZg-apSA
Embedding disabled by request
WtPL,
Didn’t Larry also say that he provided legal counsel in labor disputes in California? AHAhahahaah
Sinclair should hire Jackie Chiles as his attorney….
Jackie Chiles in the Courtroom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2EirLJqghA&feature=related
Jackie Chiles - The Coffe Case (el caso del café)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ifgj8WXp8w&feature=related
Embedding disabled by request
Jackie Chiles - The Woman In The Bra Case (la mujer del corpiño)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z36iEZxxt40&feature=related
Embedding disabled by request
Neon,
Soup Nazi staring Borat !!!
I loved it !!!
James,
Yes, he did! Although I would call that “helping people commit Workers’ Comp fraud.”
RuhRoh,
You’ve got to love Larry’s euphemisms!
Larrdo and Bossie are dumber than two boxes of rocks.
BTW, FatBoy, we knew that you, an officer of the corporation–yeah, Mr. Chairman of the Board of Sinclair Publishing, Inc.–could be served properly. Service on a corporation is not just limited to a registered agent but to any officer (unless you’re going to argue that Chairman of the Board is not an officer of the corp). If you would bother to read FRCP about service you would’ve found that out. FOOLED YA! So Sinclair Publishing, Inc. was properly served when the proccess server handed you copies of the complaint: one for you personally and one for Sinclair Publishing, Inc. And because you’re an idiot, you’ve already responded for Sinclair Publishing, Inc. (even though a corp has to be represented by a lawyer–also in FRCP). nyuck nyuck NYUCK you’re such a stupid douche.
Larry SickliAr for Congross 2010 screeches:
Mr. Oparil has filed SP, Inc’s Florida Div of Corporations filings as exhibits in his numerous pleadings, and the name and address of Sp, Inc’s registered agent is clearly noted on those filings. Yet with that, Plaintiff’s have not yet affected service on the registered agent as is required by law. Bottom line, SP, Inc has not been served the complaint as required by law and therefore is not required to file an answer until 21 days after such service has been completed.
10 hours ago · Flag
Counsel for Daniel Parisi has filed an AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT with the US District Court seeking a Default Judgement against Sinclair Publishing, Inc. Mr. Oparil however failed to acknowledge that Sinclair Publishing, Inc has yet to be served by him considering such service must be made on the Registered Agent
COWCaoilfhionn Justaboutanywhere
Simply odd…and this guy is a high powered attorney with a high powered firm that should have all his i’s dotted and his t’s crossed…waddup widdat?
Yes he did. But I think that was before a labor board - grievance type civil situation which is considerably less formal, etc and allows pro se or designate.
from his old site:
What Sinclair overlooks is that:
1) the other information he gave out in that Youtube exchange could only have come from his (ie the first time the limo driver got named AND the address of the hotel he was staying at that had been a secret for his own “safety” - as examples)
2) on his previous (first?) site, he spent ages defending his claims about having a degree and legal schooling, etc.
FTD may have been a union rep/delegate for front desk clerks @ the hotel he claimed to work at
WTPL,
I love reading sinclair crazed comments from long ago….
Larry Sinclair: Obama Accuser Hits Youtubers Up For Cash
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/02/larry-sinclair-obama-accuser-hits-youtubers-up-for-cash/
* I wish I could get threads back from BigHeadDC, where we would argue all day…
THOSE were the days !
Speaking of Worker’s Comp, CA has the most liberal worker’s comp laws in the country. Larry (conveniently) lived in CA only long enough to file for it and stiff a car dealer.
Speaking of car dealers, has Larry ever bought a car and actually paid for it? Seems like he’s left angry sellers in CA, CO, FL and DE.
“I wish I could get threads back from BigHeadDC”
Personally, for totally non-Sinclair related reasons, I’m so glad BHDC posts are gone. He did some ridiculous posts on me which were really irritating and dishonest.
Sluggo you are so right!
SickLIAR was and always will be a RETARDED abandoned child
Hey Sluggo !
I don’t remember what he said about you, but those threads are long gone I think….
I haven’t been over there to BigheadDC in AGES (2 years)
I always suspected they had some sort of spyware, and I don’t need the aggravation….
Sinclair’s response of a week ago was posted today on the docket received July 6th:
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-main.pdf
Document 23 Filed July 6 2010 Page 1 of 5
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-1.pdf
23 1 Exhibit
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-2.pdf
23-2 Exhibit B
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-3.pdf
23-3 Exhibit C
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-4.pdf
23-4 Exhibit D
http://theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/1-10-cv-00897-RJL/23-5.pdf
23-5 Exhibit E
I love how Larry specifies in the filing that he and Sinclair Publishing are “one and the same,” and then tries to claim that SP hasn’t been served.
I know Judge Leon’s clerk is reading FTD response saying to him/herself WTF did they send us these Globe magazine articles ?
LarryLogik at its finest.
I love how Larry specifies in the filing that he and Sinclair Publishing are “one and the same,” and then tries to claim that SP hasn’t been served.
BHDC was in cahoots with Larry.
If you were posting there you’d remember how that went down. Especially for someone like me, who Larry really, really didn’t like. That was back when I posted as “Concerned Citizen” and I posted directly to Larry’s blog.
Of course, that’s before I realized we were working with con-men. It was a good friend of mine, googalicious, who discovered the warrant for his arrest in Colorado. And she really got the ball rolling on forcing him to expose his criminal history.
Jeez. Now I’m taking a trip down memory lane. I remember the time before The Mitch and Nan Show, when were all just a loose assortment of people pulling in a million different ways. Mitch the Bitch, indeed.
HA!
OT–Happy 70th birthday, Ringo!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztoSUhbNntQ
John, I remember the Big Head days. How we suspected too they were feeding Larry IP Addresses and info to him.
Sick place, but it is how we all met.
Neon, Thanks for clarifying the Rense stuff… I miss most of it because I focus on Lartard.
Goofy’s Starla didn’t just Have a Moment. I think she’s earned a visit from Larry’s pals, the USSS. (bold highlighting added)
Starla // July 7, 2010 at 6:47 pm
CW,
This is for you, and J Christian Adams who I will try to contact to show him this amazing video!!!
THIS VIDEO MUST GO VIRAL!!
ERIC HOLDER IS BEHIND DROPPING THE CHARGES FOR REFUSING TO BOEY THE LAWS AND FOR REFUSING TO ENFORCE THE LAWS IN THE USA, IN RACISM & FOR FAILING TO PROTECT US AND FOR FAILING TO GIVE TO CAUCASIONS EQUAL PROTECTIONS UNDER THE USA CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS!!
THIS CAN & SHOULD GET ERIC HOLDER FIRED & DISBARRED!!
+ + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MUST SEE VIDEO!!
“Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter Intimidation – Bill O’Reilly Reports ”
xxxp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BemSmTNDxU&feature=player_embedded
Listen to everything Attorney Bartle Bull says!! Remember, Bartle Bull is an eyewitness to the crimes since he was there in person watching the crimes take place!!
Americans, Eric Holder is blocking the USA Laws from being enforced!! Sound familiar?! Eric Holder needs to be disbarred and fired!!
Why?! Eric Holder refuses to appoint Special Prosecutors to investigate Barack Obama’s Stolen Social Security numbers he has in his possession, and the current Stolen Social Security # xxx-xx-4425 Barack Obama is using is from a deceased man who was born in 1890 that was Stolen from the state of Connecticut for Obama to use because Barack Obama is an Illegal Alien living in the USA who is committing hundreds of thousands of Serial Crimes, and the mountains of crimes of Barack Obama that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. and many others have sent to him, and to SG Elena Kagan as well, Wric Holder, and Elena Kagan are ignoring!!
Listen to what Mr. Bull says in the last five minutes of the video.
Even Mr. Bill O’Reilly who is an Obot states, that it is a “FAIR QUESTION TO ASK ERIC HOLDER WHY HE DROPPED THIS CASE!!”
This information MUST GET TO
J Christian Adams and to Congress!!
We The People now have clear evidence to remove Eric Holder. This J Christian Adams case is Eric Holder & Soetoro/Obama’s who are Serial Criminal thugs who are Refusing To Obey & Refusing To Enforce The Laws – “Holder & Obama-Serial-Criminal-Gate!!”
I will not let our FREE & Beautiful country, the United States Of America be destroyed by these open Serial Criminals who are committing open Serial Crimes because they REFUSE TO OBEY THE LAWS, AND THEY REFUSE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS, and it is their mandated jobs to do so, in our Beautiful America, just so they can keep the illegal votes, acorn votes, and the black national votes to keep them in corrupt power!!
Attorney Bartle Bull is a Democrat speaking out about Democrats breaking the laws and their corruption and their refusal to obey the laws, and their refusal to enforce the laws equally in the USA, in clear legal violations of the civil rights laws!!
Get Outraged Americans And STAND UP & DEMAND that the Rule Of Law in the USA Constitution be equally and mightily enforced under equal protections of our great laws!!
WE THE PEOPLE, IT IS TIME!!
WE MUST GET OUR VOICES UP & DEMAND that all people must be given equal protection under the laws.
WE THE PEOPLE MUST DEMAND THAT THE SERIAL CRIMINAL THUGS ERIC HOLDER AND BARACK OBAMA/BARRY SOETORO WHO BOTH REFUSE TO OBEY THE LAWS, AND WHO BOTH REFUSE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS – WHICH IS THEIR SOLE LEGAL JOBS TO DO – GET REMOVED OUT OF OFFICE – AS WE THE PEOPLE RIDE THEM OUT ON A RAIL – INTO TRIALS AND INTO JAIL, AS THEY DESERVE THIS FOR THEIR SERIAL CRIMES THEY ARE COMMITTING IN PURE CORRUPTION IN THE USA!!
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II/BARRY SOETORO DESERVES TO BE EXECUTED PUBLICLY FOR HIS FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY USURPATION OF OUR USA POTUS AND COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF POSITION, SINCE BARACK OBAMA/BARRY SOETORO IS 100% TRULY A FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY TERRORIST, ENEMY COMBATANT, ILLEGAL ALIEN IMPOSTER & A DESPICABLE SERIAL CRIMINAL WHO MUST BE ARRESTED FOR HIS CRIMES HE IS COMMITTING IN THE USA!!
How dare these Serial Criminals come into our Beautiful America, The Land Of The Free & The Home Of The Brave, and ATTACK AND DEFILE OUR GREAT NATION WITH THEIR DAILY SERIAL CRIMINAL CRIME SPREES?!!
We The People have the power to rid ourselves of these criminals!! Let’s Just STAND TOGETHER and DEMAND they get IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED!! There are millions of us, and only a few thousand of these criminal thugs!!!
Let’s Roll…….Brother & Sisters…….
It’s Time To Stand Up and Get These Serial Criminal Thugs Arrested!! It Is As Simple As This!! Let’s Roll…….Brother & Sisters…….
Luv You All!!
Starla // July 7, 2010 at 7:00 pm
Typos, So Sorry, OBEY not BOEY
CAUCASIANS not CAUCASIONS
Eric not Wric
Jeez. Now I’m taking a trip down memory lane. I remember the time before The Mitch and Nan Show, when were all just a loose assortment of people pulling in a million different ways. Mitch the Bitch, indeed.
John, I remember all too well. I was “LegalLady” back then. Mitch & Nan invited me to their brand new website in April 2008. Thats when the fun began. Before that, I really didn’t know many people at all. I was sort of a loner who loved aggravating(sp?) Lardass and at that time, Victor.
TRIP DOWN M&N “the SHOW”
MEMORY LANE
The First Kool Kids’ Comments at M&N Show
John Freeman’s FIRST COMMENT:
democratista’s FIRST COMMENT:
KSTREET aka Legal Lady aka Gemini on YouTUBE
FIRST POST AT M&N
Jack Black’s FIRST COMMENT:
SWEET SARAH’s FIRST COMMENT:
ZeN’s FIRST COMMENT
EVIE’s FIRST COMMENT
Kato’s FIRST COMMENT:
STILLwaitingfortruth FIRST COMMENT
NEONZX’ FIRST COMMENT:
M.I.CRAZY’s First comment:
JAMES FIRST COMMENT:
Billy Delyon’s FIRST COMMENT
YANKEE CLIPPER FIRST COMMENT:
Where’s the Proof, Larry? FIRST COMMENT
FWMAMI’s FIRST COMMENT:
BADPOET FIRST COMMENT:
BORAT FIRST COMMENT:
GILLIGAN’s FIRST COMMENT
GLIX FIRST COMMENT:
JOEYMAC FIRST COMMENT:
RUHROH FIRST COMMENT:
Kudos to Meesh the best archiver I know!
Wow, Meesh. That brings back memories.
Although, I think I should qualify my comment. By this time I was trolling Victor with Paul because he was so hilariously insipid. He spent a lot of time commenting on my actions and comments (often not realizing my sarcasm or practical jokes), so I thought I would egg him on by insinuating that he must be in love with me.
Also, this reminds me of the time that Sinclair accused me of being David Axelrod’s son, so I started to call him Papa Axelrod (an homage to Paul’s inclination to call Sinclair “Papatard”).
Kstreet’s, I remember when you posted as LegalLady. I don’t remember clearly, but my memory tells me that Sinclair once accused me of being you. Or it was another poster that went by something with Legal in the name. Also, I’ve been Mitch, Nan, Paul, and a million other people over my tenure. Good times.
Can anyone tell me if Nan ever got her Jimmy Choo’s?
Meesh, that’s great! I just found out that Rooney isn’t dead. And in hindsight, he’s far too good looking (even today) to play Lardy. Here’s another possibility -
John Freeman, I remember the good old days at BHDC when Mitch would egg Larry on and get him totally flustered. Hilarious!
Thanks Meesh for the trip down memory lane.
That was nice reminiscing about the good ole days.
Your a jewel Meesh.
And we appreciate you.
Wow, a trip down memory lane. Thanks, Meesh!
I found this old comment by COW at M&N’s I love what Mitch tells her.
Cao
caosblog.com
Threadjack
This one’s for Gilligan.
Orly filed an APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION RE: SANCTIONS with the Supreme Court.
It’s totally wacked out.
http://www.scribd.com/full/34041283?access_key=key-1kgzbfttbxat9vtcfq8h
ORLY TAITZ APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION RE: SANCTIONS
GG,
I pity everyone who is forced to read Orly’s tortured pleadings! She is genuinely crazy!
So who wrote the wackiest leagal-ese? Orly or Sickliar?
Nothing really exciting here but revisiting this:
On the case docket as of June 28th or so:
http://www.theregulator.net/wtpl1/Parisi/DC110-cv-00897-RJL.docket.06282010.pdf
We have two docket entries
As you can see above, the court has two “RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed” in docket entry #3 and docket entry #4. One is for “LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR served on 6/7/2010″ and the other is for “SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC. served on 6/7/2010″
As the court did not receive a legal response prepared by a lawyer from SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC by June 28, 2010, the court has accepted Parisi’s motion that SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC is in default. For the court to accept Parisi’s motion, the court must have also accepted the “RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed” for “SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC. served on 6/7/2010″
Unless it is told otherwise and legally convinced by the attempt to tell it otherwise, the court considers SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC legally served - contrary to Sinclair’s nonsense quoted at the top of this post. A legal response from SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC was due from a lawyer representing SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC on June 28, 2010. As a legal response was not received by the court, the court found SINCLAIR PUBLISHING, INC in default.
Now, I think many knew the above but more or less, there it is, clearly laid out in black and white. Sinclair’s post is once again wrong.
The interesting thing is that Amazon for example, got served considerably later. Their motion to get an extension has been granted and they have until Aug 2, 2010 to respond because they didn’t get served as quickly as some of the other defendants. The interesting thing is that not only has SPI been found in default but Sinclair’s motion to get an extension hasn’t been accepted by the court even though he responded much sooner. So the judge may still be weighing Parisi’s motion to find Sinclair himself in default.
stay tuned ..
WTPL, your analysis, as usual is spot on! Keep up the excellent work!
WtPL,
Larry’s usual shenanigans are likely to work against him in this case, in a big way. For Larry, everything exists simply to be distorted and parsed in ridiculous ways. Larry is going to learn the hard way that the protocols and regulations surrounding service of process don’t exist to turn the filing of a lawsuit into a game; they weren’t formulated as a means of creating massive loopholes and gaps in the system. They serve one end: verification. Failure to respond to a legal action is a big deal with serious consequences, and SoP protocols exist solely to ensure that the person being sued knows that he’s being sued, and isn’t going to get screwed by ignoring a lawsuit that he wasn’t even aware of. Larry knows; Larry has written about it incessantly for weeks now; Larry has himself verified service. He has no excuse.
In my opinion, Dan Parisi is an honorable business man who wants to clear his name, which Sinclair sullied.
Sinclair never had proof of the allegations made toward Parisi from the onset.
The Parisi allegations, as I mentioned in several postings, was merely a “hook” to pull back the supporters he had lost after the polygraph test results.
It will be quite interesting to see how Sinclair explains himself and produce documented evidence that some unknown person who just happened to have Sinclair’s telephone number, decided not to email Sinclair this info, but to conveniently call him in the middle of the night. Sounds like a grade B spy movie. Sinclair’s lies will be exposed fully when he is deposed! I can’t wait!
Nobody can top Orly for sheer wackiness. I love how she cc’d the United Nations. Now she can be a worldwide laughingstock instead of just in the US.
Hi Kids! Greetings from the Caribbean!
My access to internet services continues to SUCK but, I’ve had good access for the last week and have been catching up on all the postings and your comments.
It’s hard to believe Lardo has become more obese…”Shamu” is a good name for him. Gawd, what a disgusting pile of dung he is. Whatever became of his pledge to only eat good wholesome food and to lose weight for his CONgressional campaign?
It’s always good for me to read your comments and the main postings, glad to know someone is keeping tabs on the crook and the “Fools for Larry.”
Hopefully I’ll have some good internet access over the coming weeks and will be able to participate more.
Renovations to my home continue and should be completed within the next two weeks. It was supposed to be completed a couple weeks ago but the family working on the house had a real tragedy, their youngest son (age 28) died in New Orleans after diving in a river, striking his head on a rock and drowning. Very sad, they are a great family and it was very sad to share this experience with them.
My best to all!
YC
Yep. Got to respect him for putting his money up with an expensive law firm like he’s hired to protect his good name. And to have the allegations scrutinized in an open court process.
How can one respect the hypocrisy of career con man fraudster who howls at the lawsuit after having tried to frivolously do the same thing to the three bloggers and while accusing Parisi’s legal council of lying?
Sinclair told folks that he had this person’s name and that his lawyers and I believe Crewdson had talked with them to verify the tip came from this person. It will be very interesting to see if he can verify that to the court and show that someone at that phone number with a maiden name of “Sinclair” bears no relationship to him, etc after he claimed it was an anonymous tip (subpoena of phone records sounds in order here to see if they talked before the time he claimed they did). Of course what is really daunting in my opinion, is one anonymous tip doesn’t legally justify him to defame Parisi in the way that he has.
It’s one thing to pass on that he got such a tip (if that was indeed legit which is rather questionable in my opinion based upon what has been provided to us). But it’s another when you draw conclusions and start producing statements of fact when it is a mere, flimsy allegation in the best case. I think he’ll have big time trouble there. Even in the above interview with Rense, Rense suggests it’s just an allegation and Larry tries to ‘correct’ him - emphasizing that Larry believes it to be a fact (roughly paraphrased). His stuff on Parisi is riddled with problems like that in my opinion.
((((((((((Yankee Clipper!))))))))))))))
Sooooooooo Nice to see you!
Thanks for popping in to say HELLO, we missed you!
YC,
It’s great to hear from you!
Hi {{{{{{{{Meesh}}}}}}} Wasn’t sure you were “on duty” today. Hope all is well for you!
Hola James!
Good to see you back too….and I’m impressed by your line of work! Keep it up (for ALL of us)
The high powered attorney obviously knew what he was doing since the court ruled in his favor. Larry should admit he knows nothing about the law and quit taking advice from his moronic friends.
A respected, intelligent, law abiding citizen like Parisi knows to hire a professional when it comes to legal matters.
P.S. Howdy Yankee Clipper!
HI Y.C.
I was in Boston a few weeks ago and thought of you.
MI….
You were in Boston?????????????? I’m in Boston right now! I work in Boston. Boo Hoo…we could have gone foil shopping.
Heya YC!!
Great to hear from you, hope all is well!
M.I.Crazy says:
July 8, 2010 at 1:37 pm
HI Y.C.
I was in Boston a few weeks ago and thought of you.
I’ll be back in MA probably in mid-August for a 6 week vacation. Then on to Ohio for a week visit with my Dad.
Hi demo!
You too, Borat! 
Ummm, does Fats have any cheerleaders left? What are the chances his Board of Directors resigned en masse when they were notified of Parisi’s law suit, thereby necessitating FB’s dissolution of the the publishing empire?
Howdy YC.
It’s always good to see you sir.
{{{{{YC}}}}} hey there! You are missed around here. I hope your internet connection gets better with time.
Thanks for the welcome kato and KSt! Much appreciated! Hope all is well with you and yours!
Nice to see you YC.
Apparently not enough to pay for a retainer before the deadline to respond.
Might have been a factor. Though I think it was more likely a lame attempt to cut his legal fees down to one party. Two retainers at $5,000 a pop is tough when you can’t seem to raise the scratch for one retainer.
Hi YC…
Oh we miss you. I don’t know what the weather is like where you are now…but the hot/humid front we’ve had here is nasty. OTOH…it’s a heck of a lot better than snow!
MI….you have to go to Fenway Pahk.
Hi YC!
Nice to hear from you!
This afternoon, Oparil filed a motion for default judgement against SPI.
Patience please while I get uploaded to scribd.
OMG!!! Oparil commited the ultimate sin! He called Larry “DUDE” in an email exchange today and Larry ripped him for it.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34073166/Parisi-et-al-v-Sinclair-et-al
Parisi et al v Sinclair et al
democratista’s says:
July 8, 2010 at 4:10 pm
Hi YC…
Oh we miss you. I don’t know what the weather is like where you are now…but the hot/humid front we’ve had here is nasty. OTOH…it’s a heck of a lot better than snow!
Hi demo!
It’s 96 degrees here today, with bright blue skies, not a cloud to be seen. The trade winds make the temp livable…in the shade. Mango season is here…be careful where you park, the mangoes sound like bricks bouncing on the car…especially if you are sitting in the car when one drops from the tree.
All most any thing is better then SNOW
Hi YC.
Funny you mention Ohio, I will be passing through there about Aug 26-27th ish, unless I reverse my road-trip. Then it would be about the 9th or 10th of Aug.
Part of our roadtrip takes us through Florida but I am trying to decide if I do FL first or Last. (Early August or Later) A huricane warning could choose for me.
(If the Douchbag is reading this, the Florida portion of my trip has NOTHING to do with him, though it may be a Mickey Mouse Affair.)
Neon,
AHAHAH!!!!! That made me laugh out loud!
Larry, dude! You really don’t have a clue.
lol
Someone better get a lawyer quick or it’s going to get really costly to not only defend this thing but to try to overturn the judgement (it probably already is much more costly now). Not that I expect he can ever be significantly successful but it would probably be good for a few laughs to see that “lwa and asters degree” try.
Should he rustle up a retainer for a lawyer and even manage to get the default vacated, the next thing Parisi might do is ask for costs of the delay - because it’s nobody’s fault except SPI’s. And Sinclair will have to have his hand right back out to his tinhatters to squeeze every last dime they have left to throw at his lost cause … while whatever they come up with, it very likely won’t be enough.
Anyone get the sense that Parisi’s legal machine is like a giant, well maintained bulldozer while Sinclair and SPI are just two little piles of soggy dung about to get flattened?
Okay, all the separate files from Oparil’s motion for default are up on one of my scribd accounts:
http://www.scribd.com/lewis_clark
Let’s see if I understand this correctly. The Dude sends Oparil an e-mail calling him an “ass.” Oparil responds by calling the Dude, a dude; the dude gets his knickers in a bunch. Oparil should have just called him a dudette. Abuela (Grandma) Lorenzo would have appreciated that! Bad Oparil, bad. LOL
Any one else see this ad next to Parisi’s filing?
Ads by Google
Self-Publish Your Book
Get Help from Start to Finish +
555 Free Book Promotion Tips Now
http://www.createspace.com
LOL
Thanks NeonZX !!
Your the man !!!!
God, I wish Gilli was here to soak all of this in.
She’s going to REALLY enjoy reading this.
She must be really busy today…….
I’m thinking a good thought for her now.
AHAH From a footnote in the memorandum:
Mr. Oparil forgot the ‘dude’ there.
Neon,
Are you aware that A picture (yours ???) shows up on your scrib account ???
Meesh, you may want to email Neon about this
Thanks
You know, Larry’s allegedly ill mother is the resident agent for the now-dissolved ‘corporation.’ Does anyone else find it rather distressing that Larry seems to have been vehemently clamoring for his ailing mother to be accosted by a lawsuit in her hospital bed? To my mind, that shows a distinct want of filial piety.
Jame’s says:
July 8, 2010 at 5:19 pm
AHAH From a footnote in the memorandum:
Contrary to SPI and Sinclair’s apparent belief, there is no legal requirement that a corporation must be served only through its resident agent. Sinclair and SPI simply have no clue.
So much for that lwa and aster’s degree. Gawd Lardy, you gotta be the dumbest dude I’ve never met
YC< I know of that company, and I think I made a comment a long time ago, that Lardy could have done his book nearly FREE, but I never mentioned their name. I didn’t want to offer ANY assistance to Lardass.
He milked his Tards for that money (Probably mostly from Dr. Ila Peterson) when he could have done it free. (Certainly for under $50) They are owned by Amazon and pay royalties directly to the author as a Print On Demand Publisher. I believe they take orders, print and ship and all the author has to do after making the book is rake in the dough.
I think I passed this info onto Mitch if he wanted to write a book about the Fatty Tuna Douche.
What a total Douchebag!
If you scroll over to the right on the document at the top of the webpage, you can read the attached memorandum that is mentioned in the motion. Larry is definitely playing with the big boys now.
An aside: Oparil’s motion and memorandum makes Orly’s look like a birdcage liner.
So I guess Larry’s new argument will be that Oparil hasn’t served him because his name is clearly not ‘Dude’? The legal genius at work! ROFLMAO!
Damm, I wish Gilli was here…
I need her to explain to my WHY Mr. Oparil is ONLY asking for 5,000.00 and not the 30/90 million he orginally requested.
Not that it matter much, because I doubt if Sinclair publishing is worth $500.00, but I just enjoy seeing FB squirm.
RuhRoh,
Sinclair refered to Mr. Oparil as an ass, so Mr. Oparil refers to him as dude.
Oparil is cool. I love this guy.
Kato,
Check out the Memorandum, which lays out why Oparil feels $5M is fair.
Parisi et al v Sinclair et al - 2010-07-08 - memo in suppor for default judgement
kato-
It would appear they are asking for $5 million from SPI for it’s portion of the total alleged damages. Remember, there are still other defendants, including Larry himself.
Thanks RuhRoh !!!
Thanks NeonZX !!!
I think Oparil is being pretty reasonable with Sinclair. He didn’t have to lay it out for Sinclair in the emails but he did in layman’s language as much as one can do that with the law. Where it helps Parisi’s case is that the judge will see Larry got some pretty clear legal advice when he hasn’t made it happen for himself. Now one may not trust what the opponent’s attorney is saying and that is understandable but when that attorney cites the law, it behooves the recipient to check it out. After checking it out, one who does have a legal clue should be able to quote the relevant laws that refute it and if they can’t, they know Oparil is probably correct.
We’ve done the same exercise here and arrived at the same place Oparil did. I don’t know where Sinclair’s imagining this business about his “registered (business) agent” needing to be served before SPI can be regarded as having been legally served.
My grandfather repeatedly worked this line of advice over “a word to the wise is sufficient.”
To me, those emails do help make the case to the court that this “dude doesn’t have a clue” as we’ve known since about January, 2008.
Another line I enjoyed was something about Rense “ducking” being served. If one is so confident in Sinclair’s case and their position, why “duck” to avoid it?
On page 9 of 14 it says..
“all defendants have been served EXCEPT for rense who has been ducking service for weeks”
hahaha
on page 13 of 14 it says….
“Given SPI’s apparent meager circumstances, a judgement in the amount of $5,000.00 should be entered.
hahahaha
@kato –
That’s $5 million.
hahahaha Rense is hiding
hahahahahhahaha
You’ve got to love how Larry basically tells Oparil that he is blowing the suit off, going on vacation, etc., and maybe, when he returns from vacation, he’ll look for an attorney.
You can’t make this stuff up! Between Orly and Sinclair, I think I can cancel my cable subscription!
i’M BAAAACK.
The power supply for my laptop died, but we picked up a replacement.
Now I’ll go back and read Oparil’s newest.
gilligan, dude! You’re gonna love it!
What’s going on at Sinclair Watch?
http://sinclairwatch.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/defamation-and-hypocrisy/http://sinclairwatch.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/defamation-and-hypocrisy/
Myspace Fun Flash Comments
Thanks Glix !
Hey Gilli, I was worried about you…..
enjoy reading !!!
Kato: On page 9 of 14 it says..
“all defendants have been served EXCEPT for rense who has been ducking service for weeks”
Kato, I knew it! I knew that the cowardly Rense must have been ducking service.
I agree Kato, if he’s such a staunch believer in Sinclair’s story, wouldn’t this be an opportune time to bring it out in the open once and for all? Validation of Sinclair’s book, is obviously something Rense wants to stay far away from.
That indicates to me that Rense, Goofy and a few others may have KNOWINGLY leant their support and media outlets to Sinclair’s efforts to defame Obama, Parisi, Axelrod, Michelle Obama and a host of others, while knowing that it was all a lie.
The most eggregious lie of all was the entire Donald Young saga. To me, anyone supporting and promoting that specific lie, should go straight to hell, period, end of story!
Neon , hehehehehehhe!
Haha, Larry got called “Dude”
If this exchange had happened in person I can see Larry getting a sweaty and huffy and puffy and start screeching about including that email in the filings (because of course the Judge is going to be just as appalled about him being called “Dude”) and Oparil just laughing in his face saying ,”Feel free.”
neon,
That’s a keeper
That memorandum is very well written, and LaRye doesn’t have a clue *DUDE*
And how can Larrdo go on vacation if he’s a welfare queen and doesn’t work? Sounds like he’s getting ready to boogie from Port Orange.
Had to revisit (can you believe this is almost 2 years ago??),
http://theregulator.net/neonzx/larry-harrassing-neonzx-edit.mp3
DUDE!
kato,
I almost grabbed our friend’s laptop just to check in, but once we knew we could get a replacement locally, I just had to wait, most impatiently, until we got back from the store.
And DAYUM! I missed Yankee. I’m going to sulk.
There’s A
New Post!
by the regulator community
Myspace Fun Flash Comments