5 thoughts on “A thief entered the room to steal and threatened the owner's life. The dog bit him to kill or seriously injured him. What is the responsibility of the owner, what will the dog be?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This has to analyze the case from two aspects:
. The thief entered the room to steal it, and there was evidence to prove that the thief took out the weapon to threaten the owner's life. Do not assume legal responsibility.
. The thief entered the room to steal it. If there is no evidence, it can prove that the thief took out the weapon to threaten the owner's life. Take the corresponding legal responsibility.
Reason: The owner finds a thief, you can tie the thief to the public security police station for treatment, but the dog must not be allowed to kill the thief. Although the thief is abominable or hateful, but the crime should not be damaged, it should be handled by the judicial organs.
If the thief threatens the life of the host's life during theft, it is not simply theft, and it has risen to robbery. This is the upgrade of crime. If we encounter malignant violent crimes such as intentional homicide, robbery, rape, the owner, the owner The counterattack made, no matter what harm to the suspect, is a legitimate defense, and the invaders will not bear any legal responsibility.
The owner is a dog without any fault and will not be punished. It is only some funeral costs of the thief may be paid.
In this case, if the dog is biting it, the owner should himself. If the owner does not stop, the owner should actually bear a certain responsibility.
The thief entered the room to threaten the name of the owner, and the dog killed him, and the owner had no legal responsibility. Dogs are not responsible.